PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JUST vs. GSLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JUST vs. GSLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (JUST) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JUST achieves a 11.64% return, which is significantly higher than GSLC's 8.50% return.


JUST

1D
-0.74%
1M
4.90%
YTD
11.64%
6M
11.94%
1Y
29.04%
3Y*
22.10%
5Y*
13.24%
10Y*

GSLC

1D
-0.67%
1M
4.52%
YTD
8.50%
6M
8.90%
1Y
23.28%
3Y*
20.85%
5Y*
12.70%
10Y*
14.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JUST vs. GSLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
JUST
Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
11.64%17.60%23.73%24.86%-17.88%26.89%19.59%31.54%-9.62%
GSLC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
8.50%16.17%24.21%25.09%-18.71%27.17%19.02%30.74%-9.33%

Correlation

The correlation between JUST and GSLC is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2018

0.98

The correlation between JUST and GSLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

JUST vs. GSLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JUST
GSLC

Technology

35.8%
38.0%

Financial Services

12.5%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
10.6%

Communication Services

9.3%
10.5%

Healthcare

8.6%
8.3%

Industrials

8.6%
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
5.5%

Energy

3.6%
3.2%

Utilities

2.2%
2.4%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.1%

Basic Materials

2.2%
1.5%

Technology

JUST
35.8%
GSLC
38.0%

Financial Services

JUST
12.5%
GSLC
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

JUST
9.8%
GSLC
10.6%

Communication Services

JUST
9.3%
GSLC
10.5%

Healthcare

JUST
8.6%
GSLC
8.3%

Industrials

JUST
8.6%
GSLC
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

JUST
5.5%
GSLC
5.5%

Energy

JUST
3.6%
GSLC
3.2%

Utilities

JUST
2.2%
GSLC
2.4%

Real Estate

JUST
2.2%
GSLC
1.1%

Basic Materials

JUST
2.2%
GSLC
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JUST vs. GSLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JUST
JUST Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
JUST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JUST Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
JUST Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
JUST Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
JUST Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

GSLC
GSLC Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
GSLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSLC Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
GSLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSLC Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JUST vs. GSLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (JUST) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JUSTGSLCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.36

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

2.46

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.48

10.96

+4.52

JUST vs. GSLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JUST Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the GSLC Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JUST and GSLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JUSTGSLCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

2.00

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.77

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.82

-0.04

Drawdowns

JUST vs. GSLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JUST drawdown since its inception was -33.83%, roughly equal to the maximum GSLC drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUST and GSLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JUSTGSLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.83%

-33.69%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.76%

-9.49%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.34%

-18.66%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.72%

-24.90%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-0.67%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.10%

-4.39%

-0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

2.13%

-0.25%

Volatility

JUST vs. GSLC - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (JUST) has a higher volatility of 2.94% compared to Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) at 2.74%. This indicates that JUST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JUSTGSLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

2.74%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.09%

8.84%

+0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.88%

11.72%

+0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.78%

16.62%

+0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.12%

17.68%

+1.44%

JUST vs. GSLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

JUST has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than GSLC's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JUST vs. GSLC - Dividend Comparison

JUST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, which matches GSLC's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSLC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
0.93%1.00%1.11%1.38%1.61%1.06%1.35%1.54%1.89%1.69%1.69%0.36%
JUST
Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
0.93%1.02%1.11%1.37%1.51%1.07%1.36%1.86%1.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, JUST and GSLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JUST has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to GSLC (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JUST dropped -33.83% vs GSLC's -33.69%.

On 5-year performance, JUST leads with 13.24% vs 12.70% for GSLC. On fees, GSLC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GSLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JUST has performed better with a 13.24% return vs 12.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSLC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for JUST.

JUST and GSLC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.93%.

JUST tracks JUST US Large Cap Diversified Index, while GSLC tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for JUST and 0.09% for GSLC.

JUST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JUST and GSLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer