JUST vs. GSLC
JUST (Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF) and GSLC (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from Goldman Sachs - JUST tracks the JUST US Large Cap Diversified Index while GSLC tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JUST returned 13.24%/yr vs 12.70%/yr for GSLC. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JUST charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for GSLC.
Performance
JUST vs. GSLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JUST achieves a 11.64% return, which is significantly higher than GSLC's 8.50% return.
JUST
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 4.90%
- YTD
- 11.64%
- 6M
- 11.94%
- 1Y
- 29.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.10%
- 5Y*
- 13.24%
- 10Y*
- —
GSLC
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 4.52%
- YTD
- 8.50%
- 6M
- 8.90%
- 1Y
- 23.28%
- 3Y*
- 20.85%
- 5Y*
- 12.70%
- 10Y*
- 14.64%
JUST vs. GSLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JUST Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 11.64% | 17.60% | 23.73% | 24.86% | -17.88% | 26.89% | 19.59% | 31.54% | -9.62% |
GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 8.50% | 16.17% | 24.21% | 25.09% | -18.71% | 27.17% | 19.02% | 30.74% | -9.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between JUST and GSLC is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2018 | 0.98 |
The correlation between JUST and GSLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
JUST vs. GSLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JUST
GSLC
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
JUST
GSLC
Financial Services
JUST
GSLC
Consumer Cyclical
JUST
GSLC
Communication Services
JUST
GSLC
Healthcare
JUST
GSLC
Industrials
JUST
GSLC
Consumer Defensive
JUST
GSLC
Energy
JUST
GSLC
Utilities
JUST
GSLC
Real Estate
JUST
GSLC
Basic Materials
JUST
GSLC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JUST vs. GSLC — Risk / Return Rank
JUST
GSLC
JUST vs. GSLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (JUST) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JUST | GSLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.36 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.33 | 2.46 | +0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.48 | 10.96 | +4.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JUST | GSLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | 2.00 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.77 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.82 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
JUST vs. GSLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JUST drawdown since its inception was -33.83%, roughly equal to the maximum GSLC drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUST and GSLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JUST | GSLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.83% | -33.69% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.76% | -9.49% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.34% | -18.66% | -0.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.72% | -24.90% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -0.67% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.10% | -4.39% | -0.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 2.13% | -0.25% |
Volatility
JUST vs. GSLC - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (JUST) has a higher volatility of 2.94% compared to Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) at 2.74%. This indicates that JUST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JUST | GSLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.94% | 2.74% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.09% | 8.84% | +0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.88% | 11.72% | +0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.78% | 16.62% | +0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.12% | 17.68% | +1.44% |
JUST vs. GSLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
JUST has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than GSLC's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JUST vs. GSLC - Dividend Comparison
JUST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, which matches GSLC's 0.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 0.93% | 1.00% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.61% | 1.06% | 1.35% | 1.54% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.69% | 0.36% |
JUST Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 0.93% | 1.02% | 1.11% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.07% | 1.36% | 1.86% | 1.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, JUST and GSLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
JUST has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to GSLC (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JUST dropped -33.83% vs GSLC's -33.69%.
On 5-year performance, JUST leads with 13.24% vs 12.70% for GSLC. On fees, GSLC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GSLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JUST has performed better with a 13.24% return vs 12.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSLC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for JUST.
JUST and GSLC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.93%.
JUST tracks JUST US Large Cap Diversified Index, while GSLC tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for JUST and 0.09% for GSLC.
JUST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JUST and GSLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer