JUSA vs. GXLC

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

JUSA (JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF) and GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. JUSA is actively managed, while GXLC is passively managed. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JUSA charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for GXLC.

Performance

JUSA vs. GXLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF (JUSA) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JUSA achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly lower than GXLC's 9.76% return.

JUSA

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 9.07%
• 6M: 8.73%
• 1Y: 25.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GXLC

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 9.76%
• 6M: 9.33%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JUSA vs. GXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JUSA JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF	9.07%	3.21%
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	9.76%	3.22%

Correlation

The correlation between JUSA and GXLC is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025	0.99

Return for Risk

JUSA vs. GXLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JUSA

JUSA Risk / Return Rank: 65
JUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
JUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
JUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 65
JUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
JUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 71

GXLC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JUSA vs. GXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF (JUSA) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JUSA	GXLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.87	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.84	—	—

Drawdowns

JUSA vs. GXLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JUSA drawdown since its inception was -14.02%, which is greater than GXLC's maximum drawdown of -9.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUSA and GXLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	JUSA	GXLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.02%	-9.08%	-4.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.56%	-1.76%	+0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.52%	-1.53%	+0.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JUSA	GXLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.48%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.69%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.36%	13.79%	-1.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.71%	13.79%	+4.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.71%	13.79%	+4.92%

JUSA vs. GXLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

JUSA has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLC's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

JUSA vs. GXLC - Dividend Comparison

JUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, more than GXLC's 0.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	0.64%	0.30%
JUSA JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF	0.87%	0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JUSA and GXLC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, JUSA and GXLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, JUSA or GXLC?

On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JUSA or GXLC?

GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for JUSA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JUSA or GXLC?

JUSA has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.64% for GXLC.

What is the main difference between JUSA and GXLC?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for JUSA and 0.02% for GXLC.