JUSA vs. FMAY

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

JUSA (JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF) and FMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. JUSA is actively managed, while FMAY is passively managed. Over the past year, JUSA returned 24.65% vs 14.22% for FMAY. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JUSA charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for FMAY.

Performance

JUSA vs. FMAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF (JUSA) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JUSA achieves a 7.68% return, which is significantly higher than FMAY's 3.87% return.

JUSA

• 1D: -2.43%
• 1M: -0.02%
• YTD: 7.68%
• 6M: 7.58%
• 1Y: 24.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FMAY

• 1D: -1.68%
• 1M: -0.02%
• YTD: 3.87%
• 6M: 4.65%
• 1Y: 14.22%
• 3Y*: 13.49%
• 5Y*: 9.17%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JUSA vs. FMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JUSA JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF	7.68%	21.69%
FMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May	3.87%	15.20%

Correlation

The correlation between JUSA and FMAY is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2025	0.94

The correlation between JUSA and FMAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

JUSA vs. FMAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JUSA	FMAY
Technology	35.6%	36.2%
Financial Services	11.7%	11.9%
Consumer Cyclical	11.1%	10.1%
Communication Services	11.0%	10.9%
Healthcare	8.5%	8.4%
Industrials	8.3%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.3%	4.9%
Energy	3.5%	3.5%
Utilities	2.4%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.9%	1.8%

Return for Risk

JUSA vs. FMAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JUSA

JUSA Risk / Return Rank: 66
JUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
JUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
JUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 67
JUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
JUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 73

FMAY

FMAY Risk / Return Rank: 80
FMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
FMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
FMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 84
FMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
FMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JUSA vs. FMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF (JUSA) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JUSA	FMAY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	2.28	-0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.81	3.26	-0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.48	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.77	3.39	-0.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.73	19.63	-6.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JUSA vs. FMAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JUSA Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the FMAY Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JUSA and FMAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JUSA	FMAY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.05	2.28	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.32	0.99	+0.33

Drawdowns

JUSA vs. FMAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JUSA drawdown since its inception was -14.02%, roughly equal to the maximum FMAY drawdown of -13.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUSA and FMAY.

Drawdown Indicators

	JUSA	FMAY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.02%	-13.60%	-0.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.93%	-4.22%	-4.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.12%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-13.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.81%	-1.81%	-1.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.51%	-2.01%	+0.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.94%	0.73%	+1.21%

Volatility

JUSA vs. FMAY - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF (JUSA) has a higher volatility of 3.53% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY) at 2.06%. This indicates that JUSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JUSA	FMAY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.53%	2.06%	+1.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.30%	4.91%	+4.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.08%	6.28%	+5.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.79%	10.61%	+8.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.79%	10.17%	+8.62%

JUSA vs. FMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

JUSA has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

JUSA vs. FMAY - Dividend Comparison

JUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, while FMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
FMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May	0.00%	0.00%
JUSA JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF	0.88%	0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JUSA and FMAY in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, JUSA and FMAY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, JUSA or FMAY?

JUSA has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to FMAY (2.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JUSA dropped -14.02% vs FMAY's -13.60%.

Which ETF is better, JUSA or FMAY?

On 1-year performance, JUSA leads with 24.65% vs 14.22% for FMAY. On fees, JUSA is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, FMAY has been the lower-risk option at 2.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JUSA or FMAY?

Over the 1-year period, JUSA has performed better with a 24.65% return vs 14.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JUSA or FMAY?

JUSA is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FMAY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JUSA or FMAY?

JUSA has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.00% for FMAY.

What is the main difference between JUSA and FMAY?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for JUSA and 0.85% for FMAY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.