JUSA vs. UJUN

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

JUSA (JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF) and UJUN (Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. JUSA is actively managed, while UJUN is passively managed. Over the past year, JUSA returned 25.55% vs 9.74% for UJUN. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JUSA charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for UJUN.

Performance

JUSA vs. UJUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF (JUSA) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June (UJUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JUSA achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly higher than UJUN's 2.66% return.

JUSA

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 9.07%
• 6M: 8.73%
• 1Y: 25.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UJUN

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -0.54%
• YTD: 2.66%
• 6M: 2.81%
• 1Y: 9.74%
• 3Y*: 10.71%
• 5Y*: 6.12%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JUSA vs. UJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JUSA JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF	9.07%	22.30%
UJUN Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June	2.66%	14.42%

Correlation

The correlation between JUSA and UJUN is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2025	0.88

The correlation between JUSA and UJUN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

JUSA vs. UJUN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JUSA	UJUN
Technology	39.2%	38.4%
Financial Services	10.9%	11.0%
Consumer Cyclical	10.7%	10.0%
Communication Services	10.5%	10.8%
Healthcare	8.2%	8.4%
Industrials	7.9%	7.9%
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	4.6%
Energy	3.1%	3.2%
Utilities	2.1%	2.1%
Real Estate	1.8%	1.8%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.7%

Return for Risk

JUSA vs. UJUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JUSA

JUSA Risk / Return Rank: 65
JUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
JUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
JUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 65
JUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
JUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 71

UJUN

UJUN Risk / Return Rank: 77
UJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
UJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
UJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 85
UJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
UJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JUSA vs. UJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF (JUSA) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June (UJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JUSA	UJUN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	2.15	-0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	3.19	-0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.49	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.87	3.45	-0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.84	18.38	-5.54

JUSA vs. UJUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JUSA Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the UJUN Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JUSA and UJUN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JUSA vs. UJUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JUSA drawdown since its inception was -14.02%, roughly equal to the maximum UJUN drawdown of -13.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUSA and UJUN.

Drawdown Indicators

	JUSA	UJUN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.02%	-13.73%	-0.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.93%	-2.84%	-6.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.24%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-11.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.56%	-0.93%	-0.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.52%	-2.06%	+0.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	0.53%	+1.46%

Volatility

JUSA vs. UJUN - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF (JUSA) has a higher volatility of 4.48% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June (UJUN) at 2.14%. This indicates that JUSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UJUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JUSA	UJUN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.48%	2.14%	+2.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.69%	3.83%	+5.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.36%	4.55%	+7.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.71%	8.37%	+10.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.71%	8.77%	+9.94%

JUSA vs. UJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

JUSA has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than UJUN's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

JUSA vs. UJUN - Dividend Comparison

JUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, while UJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
JUSA JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF	0.87%	0.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UJUN Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JUSA and UJUN in my portfolio?

JUSA and UJUN have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JUSA or UJUN?

JUSA has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to UJUN (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JUSA dropped -14.02% vs UJUN's -13.73%.

Which ETF is better, JUSA or UJUN?

On 1-year performance, JUSA leads with 25.55% vs 9.74% for UJUN. On fees, JUSA is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, UJUN has been the lower-risk option at 2.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JUSA or UJUN?

Over the 1-year period, JUSA has performed better with a 25.55% return vs 9.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JUSA or UJUN?

JUSA is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UJUN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JUSA or UJUN?

JUSA has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.00% for UJUN.

What is the main difference between JUSA and UJUN?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for JUSA and 0.79% for UJUN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.