JUSA vs. BPH
JUSA (JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JUSA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while BPH is a Oil & Gas fund actively managed by Precidian. Both are actively managed. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JUSA charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.
Performance
JUSA vs. BPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
JUSA
- 1D
- -2.43%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- 7.68%
- 6M
- 7.58%
- 1Y
- 24.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BPH
- 1D
- -1.59%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JUSA vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
JUSA JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF | -1.64% |
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF | 1.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between JUSA and BPH is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026 | 0.19 |
JUSA vs. BPH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JUSA
BPH
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
JUSA
BPH
-
Financial Services
JUSA
BPH
-
Consumer Cyclical
JUSA
BPH
-
Communication Services
JUSA
BPH
-
Healthcare
JUSA
BPH
-
Industrials
JUSA
BPH
-
Consumer Defensive
JUSA
BPH
-
Energy
JUSA
BPH
Utilities
JUSA
BPH
-
Real Estate
JUSA
BPH
-
Basic Materials
JUSA
BPH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JUSA vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank
JUSA
BPH
JUSA vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF (JUSA) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JUSA | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.73 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JUSA | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.32 | 2.77 | -1.45 |
Drawdowns
JUSA vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JUSA drawdown since its inception was -14.02%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -2.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUSA and BPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JUSA | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.02% | -2.35% | -11.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | -1.59% | -1.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.51% | -1.01% | -0.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | — | — |
Volatility
JUSA vs. BPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JUSA | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.53% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.30% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.08% | 24.64% | -12.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.79% | 24.64% | -5.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.79% | 24.64% | -5.85% |
JUSA vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
JUSA has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JUSA vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison
JUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, while BPH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JUSA JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF | 0.88% | 0.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JUSA and BPH have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for JUSA.
JUSA has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.00% for BPH.
JUSA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BPH is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for JUSA and 0.19% for BPH.
Find the right allocation for JUSA and BPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer