JUNZ vs. UXJL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JUNZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF) and UXJL (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds. JUNZ is passively managed, while UXJL is actively managed. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JUNZ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for UXJL.

Performance

JUNZ vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF (JUNZ) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JUNZ achieves a 8.42% return, which is significantly lower than UXJL's 11.78% return.

JUNZ

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 4.04%
• YTD: 8.42%
• 6M: 8.23%
• 1Y: 21.10%
• 3Y*: 16.22%
• 5Y*: 9.84%
• 10Y*: —

UXJL

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 6.02%
• YTD: 11.78%
• 6M: 11.50%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JUNZ vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JUNZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF	8.42%	7.00%
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July	11.78%	9.31%

Correlation

The correlation between JUNZ and UXJL is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2025	0.99

Return for Risk

JUNZ vs. UXJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JUNZ

JUNZ Risk / Return Rank: 61
JUNZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
JUNZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
JUNZ Omega Ratio Rank: 63
JUNZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
JUNZ Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JUNZ vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF (JUNZ) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JUNZ	UXJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.96	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.27	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JUNZ	UXJL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.12	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	1.87	-1.02

Drawdowns

JUNZ vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JUNZ drawdown since its inception was -17.88%, which is greater than UXJL's maximum drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUNZ and UXJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	JUNZ	UXJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.88%	-10.29%	-7.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.27%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.40%	-0.76%	+0.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.27%	-1.51%	-2.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.88%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JUNZ	UXJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.45%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.85%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.01%	13.90%	-3.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.74%	13.90%	-2.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.73%	13.90%	-2.17%

JUNZ vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

JUNZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than UXJL's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

JUNZ vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison

JUNZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, while UXJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JUNZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF	2.12%	2.30%	3.97%	6.03%	0.56%	0.32%
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JUNZ and UXJL in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, JUNZ and UXJL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, JUNZ or UXJL?

On fees, JUNZ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JUNZ or UXJL?

JUNZ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JUNZ or UXJL?

JUNZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 0.00% for UXJL.

What is the main difference between JUNZ and UXJL?

They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for JUNZ and 0.85% for UXJL.