JUNZ vs. APRB
JUNZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF) and APRB (Aptus April Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. JUNZ is passively managed, while APRB is actively managed. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JUNZ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for APRB.
Performance
JUNZ vs. APRB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JUNZ achieves a 8.42% return, which is significantly higher than APRB's 4.77% return.
JUNZ
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 4.04%
- YTD
- 8.42%
- 6M
- 8.23%
- 1Y
- 21.10%
- 3Y*
- 16.22%
- 5Y*
- 9.84%
- 10Y*
- —
APRB
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 4.77%
- 6M
- 5.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JUNZ vs. APRB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JUNZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF | 8.42% | 2.29% |
APRB Aptus April Buffer ETF | 4.77% | 2.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between JUNZ and APRB is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JUNZ vs. APRB — Risk / Return Rank
JUNZ
APRB
JUNZ vs. APRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF (JUNZ) and Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JUNZ | APRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.27 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JUNZ | APRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 2.00 | -1.15 |
Drawdowns
JUNZ vs. APRB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JUNZ drawdown since its inception was -17.88%, which is greater than APRB's maximum drawdown of -4.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUNZ and APRB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JUNZ | APRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.88% | -4.59% | -13.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -0.11% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.27% | -0.74% | -3.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | — | — |
Volatility
JUNZ vs. APRB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JUNZ | APRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.45% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.85% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.01% | 5.98% | +4.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.74% | 5.98% | +5.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.73% | 5.98% | +5.75% |
JUNZ vs. APRB - Expense Ratio Comparison
JUNZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than APRB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
JUNZ vs. APRB - Dividend Comparison
JUNZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, while APRB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APRB Aptus April Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JUNZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF | 2.12% | 2.30% | 3.97% | 6.03% | 0.56% | 0.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, JUNZ and APRB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, APRB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
APRB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for JUNZ.
JUNZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 0.00% for APRB.
They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for JUNZ and 0.25% for APRB.
Find the right allocation for JUNZ and APRB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer