JUNT vs. QCAP

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

JUNT (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jun ETF) and QCAP (FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April) are both exchange-traded funds - JUNT is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz, while QCAP is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by FT Vest. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JUNT returned 10.64% vs 9.00% for QCAP. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JUNT charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for QCAP.

Performance

JUNT vs. QCAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jun ETF (JUNT) and FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JUNT achieves a 2.64% return, which is significantly lower than QCAP's 4.16% return.

JUNT

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: -1.64%
• YTD: 2.64%
• 6M: 2.40%
• 1Y: 10.64%
• 3Y*: 13.18%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QCAP

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: -0.74%
• YTD: 4.16%
• 6M: 4.24%
• 1Y: 9.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JUNT vs. QCAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
JUNT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jun ETF	2.64%	12.42%	11.86%
QCAP FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April	4.16%	7.13%	10.87%

Correlation

The correlation between JUNT and QCAP is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2024	0.84

The correlation between JUNT and QCAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JUNT vs. QCAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JUNT

JUNT Risk / Return Rank: 65
JUNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
JUNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
JUNT Omega Ratio Rank: 69
JUNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
JUNT Martin Ratio Rank: 79

QCAP

QCAP Risk / Return Rank: 91
QCAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
QCAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
QCAP Omega Ratio Rank: 94
QCAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
QCAP Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JUNT vs. QCAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jun ETF (JUNT) and FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JUNT	QCAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.71	2.50	-0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	3.62	-1.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.61	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.62	4.30	-1.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.39	29.17	-15.78

JUNT vs. QCAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JUNT Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is lower than the QCAP Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JUNT and QCAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JUNT vs. QCAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JUNT drawdown since its inception was -12.78%, which is greater than QCAP's maximum drawdown of -9.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUNT and QCAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	JUNT	QCAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.78%	-9.17%	-3.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.08%	-2.10%	-1.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.92%	-1.10%	-0.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.98%	-0.53%	-0.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.80%	0.31%	+0.49%

Volatility

JUNT vs. QCAP - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jun ETF (JUNT) has a higher volatility of 2.92% compared to FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP) at 2.65%. This indicates that JUNT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QCAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JUNT	QCAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.92%	2.65%	+0.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.15%	3.21%	+1.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.25%	3.61%	+2.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.29%	8.78%	+0.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.29%	8.78%	+0.51%

JUNT vs. QCAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

JUNT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than QCAP's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

JUNT vs. QCAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither JUNT nor QCAP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JUNT and QCAP in my portfolio?

JUNT and QCAP have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JUNT or QCAP?

JUNT has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to QCAP (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JUNT dropped -12.78% vs QCAP's -9.17%.

Which ETF is better, JUNT or QCAP?

On 1-year performance, JUNT leads with 10.64% vs 9.00% for QCAP. On fees, JUNT is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, QCAP has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JUNT or QCAP?

Over the 1-year period, JUNT has performed better with a 10.64% return vs 9.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JUNT or QCAP?

JUNT is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QCAP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JUNT or QCAP?

JUNT and QCAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between JUNT and QCAP?

JUNT is categorized as Options Trading, while QCAP is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for JUNT and 0.90% for QCAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QCAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.