JUNT vs. FEBP

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jun ETF (JUNT) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February (FEBP).

JUNT and FEBP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JUNT is an actively managed fund by Allianz. It was launched on May 31, 2023. FEBP is an actively managed fund by PGIM. It was launched on Jan 31, 2024.

Performance

JUNT vs. FEBP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jun ETF (JUNT) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February (FEBP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

JUNT vs. FEBP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
JUNT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jun ETF	-1.08%	12.42%	13.81%
FEBP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February	-1.82%	12.06%	12.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JUNT achieves a -1.08% return, which is significantly higher than FEBP's -1.82% return.

JUNT

• 1D: 1.77%
• 1M: -2.05%
• YTD: -1.08%
• 6M: 1.08%
• 1Y: 13.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FEBP

• 1D: 1.86%
• 1M: -3.04%
• YTD: -1.82%
• 6M: 1.02%
• 1Y: 13.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JUNT vs. FEBP - Expense Ratio Comparison

JUNT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than FEBP's 0.50% expense ratio.

JUNT

AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jun ETF

FEBP

PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February

Return for Risk

JUNT vs. FEBP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JUNT

JUNT Risk / Return Rank: 71
JUNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
JUNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
JUNT Omega Ratio Rank: 80
JUNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
JUNT Martin Ratio Rank: 82

FEBP

FEBP Risk / Return Rank: 71
FEBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
FEBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FEBP Omega Ratio Rank: 75
FEBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FEBP Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JUNT vs. FEBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jun ETF (JUNT) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February (FEBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JUNT	FEBP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	1.19	-0.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.79	1.79	+0.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.29	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.60	1.71	-0.11
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.42	9.14	+0.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JUNT vs. FEBP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JUNT Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the FEBP Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JUNT and FEBP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JUNT	FEBP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.17	1.19	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.43	1.15	+0.27

Correlation

The correlation between JUNT and FEBP is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

JUNT vs. FEBP - Dividend Comparison

Neither JUNT nor FEBP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

JUNT vs. FEBP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JUNT drawdown since its inception was -12.78%, which is greater than FEBP's maximum drawdown of -12.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUNT and FEBP.

Drawdown Indicators

	JUNT	FEBP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.78%	-12.11%	-0.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.93%	-8.19%	-0.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.38%	-3.71%	+1.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.03%	-0.95%	-0.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.52%	1.54%	-0.02%

Volatility

JUNT vs. FEBP - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jun ETF (JUNT) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February (FEBP) have volatilities of 3.33% and 3.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JUNT	FEBP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.33%	3.47%	-0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.71%	5.55%	-0.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.85%	11.60%	+0.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.46%	9.16%	+0.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.46%	9.16%	+0.30%