JULT vs. PBJA

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

JULT (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF) and PBJA (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - January) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JULT returned 18.33% vs 12.88% for PBJA. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JULT charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PBJA.

Performance

JULT vs. PBJA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF (JULT) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - January (PBJA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JULT achieves a 5.97% return, which is significantly higher than PBJA's 4.47% return.

JULT

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 1.61%
• YTD: 5.97%
• 6M: 6.70%
• 1Y: 18.33%
• 3Y*: 16.19%
• 5Y*: 11.37%
• 10Y*: —

PBJA

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 1.48%
• YTD: 4.47%
• 6M: 5.19%
• 1Y: 12.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JULT vs. PBJA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
JULT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF	5.97%	13.73%	18.15%
PBJA PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - January	4.47%	10.33%	12.18%

Correlation

The correlation between JULT and PBJA is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2024	0.92

The correlation between JULT and PBJA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JULT vs. PBJA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JULT

JULT Risk / Return Rank: 82
JULT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
JULT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
JULT Omega Ratio Rank: 87
JULT Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
JULT Martin Ratio Rank: 88

PBJA

PBJA Risk / Return Rank: 86
PBJA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
PBJA Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
PBJA Omega Ratio Rank: 92
PBJA Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
PBJA Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JULT vs. PBJA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF (JULT) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - January (PBJA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JULT	PBJA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.55	2.80	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.72	4.19	-0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.60	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.52	3.61	-0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.94	19.63	-0.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JULT vs. PBJA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JULT Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the PBJA Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JULT and PBJA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JULT	PBJA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.55	2.80	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.16	1.77	-0.61

Drawdowns

JULT vs. PBJA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JULT drawdown since its inception was -13.57%, which is greater than PBJA's maximum drawdown of -8.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JULT and PBJA.

Drawdown Indicators

	JULT	PBJA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.57%	-8.50%	-5.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.22%	-3.58%	-1.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.57%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.57%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.02%	+0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.77%	-0.55%	-1.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.97%	0.66%	+0.31%

Volatility

JULT vs. PBJA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF (JULT) is 0.59%, while PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - January (PBJA) has a volatility of 0.63%. This indicates that JULT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBJA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JULT	PBJA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.59%	0.63%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.25%	3.71%	+1.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.23%	4.61%	+2.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.00%	6.37%	+4.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.48%	6.37%	+4.11%

JULT vs. PBJA - Expense Ratio Comparison

JULT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than PBJA's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

JULT vs. PBJA - Dividend Comparison

Neither JULT nor PBJA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
JULT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.86%
PBJA PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - January	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JULT and PBJA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, JULT and PBJA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, JULT or PBJA?

PBJA has higher volatility (0.63%) compared to JULT (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JULT dropped -13.57% vs PBJA's -8.50%.

Which ETF is better, JULT or PBJA?

On 1-year performance, JULT leads with 18.33% vs 12.88% for PBJA. On fees, PBJA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JULT or PBJA?

Over the 1-year period, JULT has performed better with a 18.33% return vs 12.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JULT or PBJA?

PBJA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for JULT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JULT or PBJA?

JULT and PBJA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between JULT and PBJA?

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for JULT and 0.50% for PBJA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PBJA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.