PBJA vs. JULJ

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - January (PBJA) and Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July (JULJ).

PBJA and JULJ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PBJA is an actively managed fund by PGIM. It was launched on Dec 29, 2023. JULJ is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Jun 30, 2023.

Performance

PBJA vs. JULJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - January (PBJA) and Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July (JULJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PBJA vs. JULJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PBJA PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - January	-1.07%	10.33%	12.18%
JULJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July	0.80%	5.91%	6.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBJA achieves a -1.07% return, which is significantly lower than JULJ's 0.80% return.

PBJA

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: -1.43%
• YTD: -1.07%
• 6M: 1.37%
• 1Y: 10.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JULJ

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 0.80%
• 6M: 2.19%
• 1Y: 5.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBJA vs. JULJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBJA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than JULJ's 0.79% expense ratio.

JULJ

Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July

PBJA

PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - January

Return for Risk

PBJA vs. JULJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBJA

PBJA Risk / Return Rank: 71
PBJA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
PBJA Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
PBJA Omega Ratio Rank: 79
PBJA Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
PBJA Martin Ratio Rank: 78

JULJ

JULJ Risk / Return Rank: 77
JULJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
JULJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
JULJ Omega Ratio Rank: 95
JULJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
JULJ Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBJA vs. JULJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - January (PBJA) and Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July (JULJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PBJA	JULJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	1.27	-0.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	2.11	-0.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.48	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.70	1.55	+0.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.53	15.70	-6.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PBJA vs. JULJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBJA Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the JULJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBJA and JULJ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PBJA	JULJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25	1.27	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.46	1.91	-0.45

Correlation

The correlation between PBJA and JULJ is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

PBJA vs. JULJ - Dividend Comparison

PBJA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JULJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.72%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
PBJA PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - January	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JULJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July	5.72%	5.76%	5.96%	3.21%

Drawdowns

PBJA vs. JULJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBJA drawdown since its inception was -8.50%, which is greater than JULJ's maximum drawdown of -3.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBJA and JULJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	PBJA	JULJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.50%	-3.62%	-4.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.16%	-3.62%	-2.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.89%	0.00%	-1.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.58%	-0.11%	-0.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.10%	0.36%	+0.74%

Volatility

PBJA vs. JULJ - Volatility Comparison

PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - January (PBJA) has a higher volatility of 2.54% compared to Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July (JULJ) at 0.68%. This indicates that PBJA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JULJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PBJA	JULJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.54%	0.68%	+1.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.74%	1.27%	+2.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.31%	4.40%	+3.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.53%	3.16%	+3.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.53%	3.16%	+3.37%