PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JULQ vs. QDTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JULQ vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


JULQ

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QDTE

1D
-0.45%
1M
7.12%
YTD
16.06%
6M
15.73%
1Y
39.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JULQ vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


JULQ vs. QDTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JULQ
QDTE

Technology

31.7%

-

Financial Services

14.0%
5.4%

Healthcare

10.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%

-

Communication Services

9.5%

-

Industrials

7.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.2%

-

Energy

3.2%

-

Utilities

2.6%

-

Real Estate

2.3%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

JULQ
31.7%
QDTE

-

Financial Services

JULQ
14.0%
QDTE
5.4%

Healthcare

JULQ
10.9%
QDTE

-

Consumer Cyclical

JULQ
10.4%
QDTE

-

Communication Services

JULQ
9.5%
QDTE

-

Industrials

JULQ
7.7%
QDTE

-

Consumer Defensive

JULQ
6.2%
QDTE

-

Energy

JULQ
3.2%
QDTE

-

Utilities

JULQ
2.6%
QDTE

-

Real Estate

JULQ
2.3%
QDTE

-

Basic Materials

JULQ
1.8%
QDTE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JULQ vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JULQ

QDTE
QDTE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
QDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
QDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JULQ vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

JULQ vs. QDTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JULQQDTEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.29

Drawdowns

JULQ vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JULQ drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum QDTE drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JULQ and QDTE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JULQQDTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-22.86%

+22.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.60%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-3.14%

+3.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

Volatility

JULQ vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JULQQDTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

14.81%

-14.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

18.42%

-18.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

18.42%

-18.42%

JULQ vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

JULQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than QDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

JULQ vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison

JULQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.41%.


Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, JULQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JULQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for QDTE.

QDTE has the higher dividend yield at 43.41%, compared with 0.00% for JULQ.

JULQ is categorized as Options Trading, while QDTE is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for JULQ and 0.97% for QDTE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JULQ and QDTE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer