DDFN vs. UXJL
DDFN (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - November) and UXJL (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DDFN charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for UXJL.
Performance
DDFN vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDFN achieves a 4.25% return, which is significantly lower than UXJL's 8.46% return.
DDFN
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 4.25%
- 6M
- 3.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UXJL
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 8.46%
- 6M
- 7.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDFN vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DDFN Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - November | 4.25% | 0.74% |
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July | 8.46% | -0.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDFN and UXJL is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2025 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDFN vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - November (DDFN) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDFN vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDFN drawdown since its inception was -3.40%, smaller than the maximum UXJL drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFN and UXJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDFN | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.40% | -10.29% | +6.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.72% | -3.71% | +2.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.47% | -1.58% | +1.11% |
Volatility
DDFN vs. UXJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDFN | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.33% | 14.58% | -9.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.33% | 14.58% | -9.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.33% | 14.58% | -9.25% |
DDFN vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDFN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than UXJL's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDFN vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither DDFN nor UXJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DDFN and UXJL have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DDFN is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DDFN is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJL.
DDFN and UXJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDFN and 0.85% for UXJL.
Find the right allocation for DDFN and UXJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer