JULB vs. ACIO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JULB (Aptus July Buffer ETF) and ACIO (Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JULB is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Aptus Capital Advisors, while ACIO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Aptus Capital Advisors. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JULB charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for ACIO.

Performance

JULB vs. ACIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB) and Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF (ACIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JULB achieves a 6.35% return, which is significantly lower than ACIO's 7.22% return.

JULB

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 2.40%
• YTD: 6.35%
• 6M: 6.93%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ACIO

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: 3.52%
• YTD: 7.22%
• 6M: 6.40%
• 1Y: 15.88%
• 3Y*: 15.97%
• 5Y*: 10.18%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JULB vs. ACIO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF	6.35%	2.56%
ACIO Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF	7.22%	0.65%

Correlation

The correlation between JULB and ACIO is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025	0.94

Return for Risk

JULB vs. ACIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACIO

ACIO Risk / Return Rank: 53
ACIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
ACIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
ACIO Omega Ratio Rank: 56
ACIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
ACIO Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JULB vs. ACIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB) and Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF (ACIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JULB	ACIO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.93	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.93	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.17	0.90	+1.27

Drawdowns

JULB vs. ACIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JULB drawdown since its inception was -5.24%, smaller than the maximum ACIO drawdown of -14.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JULB and ACIO.

Drawdown Indicators

	JULB	ACIO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.24%	-14.19%	+8.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.22%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.12%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-14.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.07%	-0.64%	+0.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.87%	-3.19%	+2.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.80%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JULB	ACIO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.18%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	6.13%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.81%	8.26%	-1.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.81%	11.05%	-4.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.81%	11.64%	-4.83%

JULB vs. ACIO - Expense Ratio Comparison

JULB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ACIO's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

JULB vs. ACIO - Dividend Comparison

JULB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ACIO Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF	0.38%	0.37%	0.44%	0.72%	1.51%	0.61%	1.02%	1.32%
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JULB and ACIO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, JULB and ACIO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, JULB or ACIO?

On fees, JULB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JULB or ACIO?

JULB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ACIO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JULB or ACIO?

ACIO has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for JULB.

What is the main difference between JULB and ACIO?

JULB is categorized as Defined Outcome, while ACIO is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JULB and 0.79% for ACIO.