JSML vs. DFSV
JSML (Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF) and DFSV (Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JSML is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Janus Small Cap Growth Alpha Index, while DFSV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. JSML is passively managed, while DFSV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, JSML returned 18.71%/yr vs 16.87%/yr for DFSV. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JSML charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for DFSV.
Performance
JSML vs. DFSV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JSML achieves a 19.06% return, which is significantly higher than DFSV's 15.01% return.
JSML
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 7.59%
- YTD
- 19.06%
- 6M
- 17.83%
- 1Y
- 33.64%
- 3Y*
- 18.71%
- 5Y*
- 6.09%
- 10Y*
- 12.88%
DFSV
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- YTD
- 15.01%
- 6M
- 14.63%
- 1Y
- 33.99%
- 3Y*
- 16.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JSML vs. DFSV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSML Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 19.06% | 13.41% | 12.45% | 30.09% | -17.80% |
DFSV Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF | 15.01% | 8.59% | 7.13% | 19.26% | 0.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between JSML and DFSV is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022 | 0.85 |
The correlation between JSML and DFSV shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JSML vs. DFSV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JSML
DFSV
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Technology
JSML
DFSV
Industrials
JSML
DFSV
Healthcare
JSML
DFSV
Financial Services
JSML
DFSV
Consumer Cyclical
JSML
DFSV
Real Estate
JSML
DFSV
Basic Materials
JSML
DFSV
Consumer Defensive
JSML
DFSV
Energy
JSML
DFSV
Communication Services
JSML
DFSV
Utilities
JSML
-
DFSV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JSML vs. DFSV — Risk / Return Rank
JSML
DFSV
JSML vs. DFSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) and Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF (DFSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JSML | DFSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.34 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 3.64 | -1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.08 | 11.57 | -3.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JSML | DFSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 1.95 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.53 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
JSML vs. DFSV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JSML drawdown since its inception was -39.65%, which is greater than DFSV's maximum drawdown of -28.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSML and DFSV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JSML | DFSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.65% | -28.02% | -11.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.84% | -9.39% | -5.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.60% | -28.02% | +2.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -0.84% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.86% | -6.71% | -4.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.17% | 2.95% | +1.22% |
Volatility
JSML vs. DFSV - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) has a higher volatility of 7.49% compared to Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF (DFSV) at 3.95%. This indicates that JSML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JSML | DFSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.49% | 3.95% | +3.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.94% | 11.28% | +4.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.56% | 17.63% | +3.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.34% | 22.24% | +2.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.27% | 22.24% | +2.03% |
JSML vs. DFSV - Expense Ratio Comparison
JSML has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than DFSV's 0.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
JSML vs. DFSV - Dividend Comparison
JSML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than DFSV's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSV Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF | 1.42% | 1.53% | 1.31% | 1.29% | 0.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JSML Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 0.80% | 0.94% | 1.19% | 0.49% | 0.67% | 0.46% | 0.30% | 0.27% | 0.76% | 0.42% | 0.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JSML and DFSV have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JSML has higher volatility (7.49%) compared to DFSV (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSML dropped -39.65% vs DFSV's -28.02%.
On 3-year performance, JSML leads with 18.71% vs 16.87% for DFSV. On fees, JSML is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, DFSV has been the lower-risk option at 3.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, JSML has performed better with a 18.71% return vs 16.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JSML is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for DFSV.
DFSV has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.80% for JSML.
JSML is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while DFSV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JSML and 0.31% for DFSV.
DFSV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JSML and DFSV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer