PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JSML vs. BITI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JSML vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JSML achieves a 21.51% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 25.22% return.


JSML

1D
1.87%
1M
-2.15%
6M
15.94%
YTD
21.51%
1Y
33.26%
3Y*
17.08%
5Y*
6.35%
10Y*
12.46%
ALL TIME*
13.47%

BITI

1D
-1.48%
1M
-4.03%
6M
13.09%
YTD
25.22%
1Y
56.28%
3Y*
-32.35%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-35.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$24.18M$25.87M$38.72M
$2.12M$2.84M$2.20M

JSML vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
JSML
Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF
21.51%13.41%12.45%30.09%1.17%
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
25.22%-1.76%-62.60%-66.17%3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between JSML and BITI is -0.47, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022

-0.39

The correlation between JSML and BITI shifts across timeframes, from -0.47 (1 year) to -0.36 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JSML vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JSML
JSML Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
JSML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JSML Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
JSML Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
JSML Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
JSML Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

BITI
BITI Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JSML vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JSMLBITIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.22

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

2.24

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.62

5.45

+2.17

JSML vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JSML Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JSML and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JSML vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JSML drawdown since its inception was -39.65%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSML and BITI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JSMLBITIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.65%

-92.16%

+52.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.84%

-25.28%

+10.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.60%

-84.63%

+59.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.47%

-86.33%

+81.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.73%

-68.61%

+57.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

10.37%

-5.99%

Volatility

JSML vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) is 6.24%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 8.93%. This indicates that JSML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JSMLBITIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.24%

8.93%

-2.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.68%

33.35%

-15.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.73%

44.25%

-21.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.53%

52.01%

-27.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.30%

52.01%

-27.71%

JSML vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

JSML has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

JSML vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

JSML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than BITI's 21.80% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
21.80%1.60%3.91%3.33%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JSML
Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF
0.61%0.94%1.19%0.49%0.67%0.46%0.30%0.27%0.76%0.42%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


JSML and BITI have a correlation of -0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITI has higher volatility (8.93%) compared to JSML (6.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSML dropped -39.65% vs BITI's -92.16%.

On 3-year performance, JSML leads with 17.08% vs -32.35% for BITI. On fees, JSML is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, JSML has been the lower-risk option at 6.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, JSML has performed better with a 17.08% return vs -32.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JSML is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 21.80%, compared with 0.61% for JSML.

JSML is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. JSML tracks Janus Small Cap Growth Alpha Index, while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JSML and 1.03% for BITI.

JSML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JSML and BITI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer