JSMD vs. QQQI

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

JSMD (Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JSMD is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index, while QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. JSMD is passively managed, while QQQI is actively managed. Over the past year, JSMD returned 31.95% vs 30.39% for QQQI. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JSMD charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.

Performance

JSMD vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JSMD achieves a 19.55% return, which is significantly higher than QQQI's 13.53% return.

JSMD

• 1D: 1.27%
• 1M: 6.04%
• YTD: 19.55%
• 6M: 17.80%
• 1Y: 31.95%
• 3Y*: 17.83%
• 5Y*: 8.38%
• 10Y*: 13.87%

QQQI

• 1D: 2.67%
• 1M: 3.39%
• YTD: 13.53%
• 6M: 14.57%
• 1Y: 30.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JSMD vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
JSMD Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF	19.55%	9.25%	14.89%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	13.53%	18.62%	19.44%

Correlation

The correlation between JSMD and QQQI is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024	0.71

The correlation between JSMD and QQQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

JSMD vs. QQQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JSMD	QQQI
Technology	28.1%	58.1%
Industrials	23.3%	3.0%
Healthcare	18.7%	3.9%
Financial Services	8.9%	0.2%
Consumer Cyclical	8.7%	11.3%
Basic Materials	3.0%	1.0%
Communication Services	2.9%	14.2%
Real Estate	2.8%	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	2.5%	6.5%
Energy	1.1%	0.5%
Utilities	-	1.3%

Return for Risk

JSMD vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JSMD

JSMD Risk / Return Rank: 45
JSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
JSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
JSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 43
JSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
JSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 47

QQQI

QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 74
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 76
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JSMD vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JSMD	QQQI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	2.14	-0.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	2.81	-0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.40	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.16	3.18	-1.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.31	13.66	-6.36

JSMD vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JSMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JSMD and QQQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JSMD vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JSMD drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSMD and QQQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	JSMD	QQQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.98%	-20.00%	-18.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.86%	-9.61%	-5.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.98%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.09%	+0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.46%	-2.21%	-5.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.38%	2.23%	+2.15%

Volatility

JSMD vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) has a higher volatility of 8.24% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 6.63%. This indicates that JSMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JSMD	QQQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.24%	6.63%	+1.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.21%	11.63%	+5.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.80%	14.33%	+7.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.99%	17.41%	+5.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.83%	17.41%	+5.42%

JSMD vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

JSMD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

JSMD vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

JSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than QQQI's 13.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
JSMD Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF	0.46%	0.54%	0.76%	0.44%	0.40%	0.28%	0.24%	0.32%	0.53%	0.30%	0.36%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	13.18%	13.82%	12.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JSMD and QQQI in my portfolio?

JSMD and QQQI have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JSMD or QQQI?

JSMD has higher volatility (8.24%) compared to QQQI (6.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSMD dropped -38.98% vs QQQI's -20.00%.

Which ETF is better, JSMD or QQQI?

On 1-year performance, JSMD leads with 31.95% vs 30.39% for QQQI. On fees, JSMD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, QQQI has been the lower-risk option at 6.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JSMD or QQQI?

Over the 1-year period, JSMD has performed better with a 31.95% return vs 30.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JSMD or QQQI?

JSMD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for QQQI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JSMD or QQQI?

QQQI has the higher dividend yield at 13.18%, compared with 0.46% for JSMD.

What is the main difference between JSMD and QQQI?

JSMD is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while QQQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JSMD and 0.68% for QQQI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.