JSMD vs. PAUG
JSMD (Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF) and PAUG (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August) are both exchange-traded funds - JSMD is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index, while PAUG is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect August Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JSMD returned 8.38%/yr vs 9.23%/yr for PAUG. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JSMD charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for PAUG.
Performance
JSMD vs. PAUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JSMD achieves a 19.55% return, which is significantly higher than PAUG's 5.25% return.
JSMD
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 6.04%
- YTD
- 19.55%
- 6M
- 17.80%
- 1Y
- 31.95%
- 3Y*
- 17.83%
- 5Y*
- 8.38%
- 10Y*
- 13.87%
PAUG
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 5.25%
- 6M
- 5.77%
- 1Y
- 15.45%
- 3Y*
- 13.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.23%
- 10Y*
- —
JSMD vs. PAUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSMD Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 19.55% | 9.25% | 15.08% | 26.81% | -22.84% | 8.40% | 30.79% | 5.03% |
PAUG Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August | 5.25% | 12.34% | 15.37% | 17.71% | -6.85% | 7.58% | 9.82% | 3.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between JSMD and PAUG is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019 | 0.77 |
The correlation between JSMD and PAUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
JSMD vs. PAUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JSMD
PAUG
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Technology
JSMD
PAUG
Industrials
JSMD
PAUG
Healthcare
JSMD
PAUG
Financial Services
JSMD
PAUG
Consumer Cyclical
JSMD
PAUG
Basic Materials
JSMD
PAUG
Communication Services
JSMD
PAUG
Real Estate
JSMD
PAUG
Consumer Defensive
JSMD
PAUG
Energy
JSMD
PAUG
Utilities
JSMD
-
PAUG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JSMD vs. PAUG — Risk / Return Rank
JSMD
PAUG
JSMD vs. PAUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JSMD | PAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.60 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 3.92 | -1.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.31 | 21.35 | -14.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JSMD vs. PAUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JSMD drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, which is greater than PAUG's maximum drawdown of -17.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSMD and PAUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JSMD | PAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.98% | -17.88% | -21.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.86% | -3.96% | -10.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.01% | -10.45% | -13.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.18% | -11.76% | -20.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.46% | -1.81% | -5.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.38% | 0.72% | +3.66% |
Volatility
JSMD vs. PAUG - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) has a higher volatility of 8.24% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG) at 1.01%. This indicates that JSMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JSMD | PAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.24% | 1.01% | +7.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.21% | 4.26% | +12.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.80% | 5.55% | +16.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.99% | 8.72% | +14.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.83% | 10.58% | +12.25% |
JSMD vs. PAUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
JSMD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than PAUG's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
JSMD vs. PAUG - Dividend Comparison
JSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, while PAUG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSMD Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 0.46% | 0.54% | 0.76% | 0.44% | 0.40% | 0.28% | 0.24% | 0.32% | 0.53% | 0.30% | 0.36% |
PAUG Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JSMD and PAUG have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JSMD has higher volatility (8.24%) compared to PAUG (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSMD dropped -38.98% vs PAUG's -17.88%.
On 5-year performance, PAUG leads with 9.23% vs 8.38% for JSMD. On fees, JSMD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, PAUG has been the lower-risk option at 1.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PAUG has performed better with a 9.23% return vs 8.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JSMD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for PAUG.
JSMD has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.00% for PAUG.
JSMD is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while PAUG is Defined Outcome. JSMD tracks Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index, while PAUG tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect August Series Index. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JSMD and 0.79% for PAUG.
PAUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JSMD and PAUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer