PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JSI vs. JBBB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JSI vs. JBBB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF (JSI) and Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JSI achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly lower than JBBB's 1.86% return.


JSI

1D
0.16%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.14%
6M
1.63%
1Y
4.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JBBB

1D
0.00%
1M
0.57%
YTD
1.86%
6M
2.30%
1Y
5.54%
3Y*
10.60%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JSI vs. JBBB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
JSI
Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF
1.14%6.46%7.27%3.39%
JBBB
Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF
1.86%5.43%12.50%4.90%

Correlation

The correlation between JSI and JBBB is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2023

0.11

The correlation between JSI and JBBB shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

JSI vs. JBBB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JSI
JBBB

Technology

33.5%

-

Financial Services

12.4%
4.2%

Communication Services

10.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%

-

Healthcare

9.5%

-

Industrials

8.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.3%

-

Energy

4.0%

-

Utilities

2.6%

-

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Basic Materials

1.9%

-

Technology

JSI
33.5%
JBBB

-

Financial Services

JSI
12.4%
JBBB
4.2%

Communication Services

JSI
10.5%
JBBB

-

Consumer Cyclical

JSI
10.0%
JBBB

-

Healthcare

JSI
9.5%
JBBB

-

Industrials

JSI
8.5%
JBBB

-

Consumer Defensive

JSI
5.3%
JBBB

-

Energy

JSI
4.0%
JBBB

-

Utilities

JSI
2.6%
JBBB

-

Real Estate

JSI
2.0%
JBBB

-

Basic Materials

JSI
1.9%
JBBB

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JSI vs. JBBB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JSI
JSI Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
JSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
JSI Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
JSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
JSI Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

JBBB
JBBB Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
JBBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JBBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
JBBB Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
JBBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
JBBB Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JSI vs. JBBB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF (JSI) and Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JSIJBBBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.36

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

2.26

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.18

7.66

+1.52

JSI vs. JBBB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the JBBB Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JSI and JBBB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JSIJBBBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

1.67

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.50

1.30

+1.20

Drawdowns

JSI vs. JBBB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JSI drawdown since its inception was -2.31%, smaller than the maximum JBBB drawdown of -10.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSI and JBBB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JSIJBBBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.31%

-10.57%

+8.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.68%

-2.46%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

0.00%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.34%

-1.58%

+1.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.52%

0.72%

-0.20%

Volatility

JSI vs. JBBB - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF (JSI) has a higher volatility of 0.67% compared to Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) at 0.45%. This indicates that JSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JBBB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JSIJBBBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.67%

0.45%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.53%

2.76%

-1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38%

3.34%

-0.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.88%

5.26%

-2.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.88%

5.26%

-2.38%

JSI vs. JBBB - Expense Ratio Comparison

JSI has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than JBBB's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

JSI vs. JBBB - Dividend Comparison

JSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.80%, less than JBBB's 7.13% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
JBBB
Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF
7.13%8.41%9.24%8.71%5.71%
JSI
Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF
5.80%5.80%6.16%0.84%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JSI and JBBB have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JSI has higher volatility (0.67%) compared to JBBB (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSI dropped -2.31% vs JBBB's -10.57%.

On 1-year performance, JBBB leads with 5.54% vs 4.73% for JSI. On fees, JBBB is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, JBBB has been the lower-risk option at 0.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JBBB has performed better with a 5.54% return vs 4.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JBBB is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for JSI.

JBBB has the higher dividend yield at 7.13%, compared with 5.80% for JSI.

JSI is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while JBBB is CLO. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for JSI and 0.49% for JBBB.

JSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JSI and JBBB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer