JSET.L vs. FUQA.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

JSET.L (JPM EUR Ultra-Short Income Active UCITS ETF – EUR (acc)) and FUQA.L (Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - JSET.L is a Dividend fund actively managed by ETF Issuer, while FUQA.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity US Quality Income Index. JSET.L is actively managed, while FUQA.L is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JSET.L returned 1.84%/yr vs 12.29%/yr for FUQA.L. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JSET.L charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FUQA.L.

Performance

JSET.L vs. FUQA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPM EUR Ultra-Short Income Active UCITS ETF – EUR (acc) (JSET.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

JSET.L is traded in GBP, while FUQA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FUQA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JSET.L achieves a -1.70% return, which is significantly lower than FUQA.L's 9.57% return.

JSET.L

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: -1.59%
• 6M: -1.17%
• YTD: -1.70%
• 1Y: -0.09%
• 3Y*: 2.93%
• 5Y*: 1.84%
• 10Y*: —

FUQA.L

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 0.64%
• 6M: 9.08%
• YTD: 9.57%
• 1Y: 20.00%
• 3Y*: 15.78%
• 5Y*: 12.29%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JSET.L vs. FUQA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
JSET.L JPM EUR Ultra-Short Income Active UCITS ETF – EUR (acc)	-1.70%	7.88%	-0.75%	1.33%	5.03%	-6.82%	5.33%	-4.77%	-10.78%
FUQA.L Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc	9.57%	8.56%	19.50%	11.85%	-0.00%	27.82%	8.23%	27.23%	-1.56%

Correlation

The correlation between JSET.L and FUQA.L is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.04
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2018	0.14

Return for Risk

JSET.L vs. FUQA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JSET.L

JSET.L Risk / Return Rank: 9
JSET.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
JSET.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
JSET.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8
JSET.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
JSET.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9

FUQA.L

FUQA.L Risk / Return Rank: 82
FUQA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
FUQA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
FUQA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FUQA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FUQA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JSET.L vs. FUQA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPM EUR Ultra-Short Income Active UCITS ETF – EUR (acc) (JSET.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JSET.L	FUQA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.02	2.08	-2.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.00	2.91	-2.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.39	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.03	3.31	-3.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.08	13.25	-13.33

JSET.L vs. FUQA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JSET.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the FUQA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JSET.L and FUQA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JSET.L vs. FUQA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JSET.L drawdown since its inception was -18.28%, smaller than the maximum FUQA.L drawdown of -27.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSET.L and FUQA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	JSET.L	FUQA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.28%	-27.34%	+9.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.70%	-6.01%	+3.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.03%	-20.49%	+6.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.03%	-20.49%	+6.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.86%	-0.49%	-7.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.12%	-7.04%	-5.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.05%	1.51%	-0.46%

Volatility

JSET.L vs. FUQA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPM EUR Ultra-Short Income Active UCITS ETF – EUR (acc) (JSET.L) is 1.01%, while Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L) has a volatility of 2.42%. This indicates that JSET.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FUQA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JSET.L	FUQA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.01%	2.42%	-1.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.79%	6.85%	-4.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.98%	9.58%	-5.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.13%	19.12%	-8.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.08%	22.35%	-12.27%

JSET.L vs. FUQA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JSET.L has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FUQA.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

JSET.L vs. FUQA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither JSET.L nor FUQA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JSET.L and FUQA.L in my portfolio?

JSET.L and FUQA.L have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JSET.L or FUQA.L?

On fees, JSET.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JSET.L or FUQA.L?

JSET.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FUQA.L.

What is the main difference between JSET.L and FUQA.L?

JSET.L is categorized as Dividend, while FUQA.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: ETF Issuer and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for JSET.L and 0.25% for FUQA.L.