PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JSCGX vs. HSPGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JSCGX vs. HSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jacob Small Cap Growth Fund (JSCGX) and Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JSCGX achieves a -21.04% return, which is significantly lower than HSPGX's 24.05% return. Over the past 10 years, JSCGX has underperformed HSPGX with an annualized return of 7.82%, while HSPGX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.94% annualized return.


JSCGX

1D
-0.60%
1M
-4.58%
YTD
-21.04%
6M
-17.10%
1Y
16.36%
3Y*
11.32%
5Y*
-8.51%
10Y*
7.82%

HSPGX

1D
-0.63%
1M
4.87%
YTD
24.05%
6M
24.29%
1Y
69.21%
3Y*
31.70%
5Y*
13.20%
10Y*
15.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JSCGX vs. HSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JSCGX
Jacob Small Cap Growth Fund
-21.04%41.65%12.89%18.74%-50.37%-0.60%60.95%20.04%8.26%20.61%
HSPGX
Emerald Growth Fund
24.05%31.62%28.04%18.66%-24.65%3.59%38.49%28.33%-12.16%27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between JSCGX and HSPGX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2010

0.84

The correlation between JSCGX and HSPGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JSCGX vs. HSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JSCGX
JSCGX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
JSCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JSCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
JSCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
JSCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
JSCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

HSPGX
HSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
HSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
HSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JSCGX vs. HSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jacob Small Cap Growth Fund (JSCGX) and Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JSCGXHSPGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.64

2.86

-2.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.07

3.53

-2.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.45

-0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.53

4.84

-4.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.21

20.52

-19.32

JSCGX vs. HSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JSCGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the HSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JSCGX and HSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JSCGXHSPGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

2.86

-2.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.24

0.52

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.64

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.44

-0.21

Drawdowns

JSCGX vs. HSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JSCGX drawdown since its inception was -70.07%, which is greater than HSPGX's maximum drawdown of -60.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSCGX and HSPGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JSCGXHSPGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.07%

-60.28%

-9.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.69%

-14.41%

-18.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.69%

-28.63%

-4.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.86%

-38.65%

-29.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.07%

-41.48%

-28.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.25%

-1.51%

-43.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.08%

-19.02%

-6.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.46%

3.39%

+11.07%

Volatility

JSCGX vs. HSPGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Jacob Small Cap Growth Fund (JSCGX) is 6.36%, while Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) has a volatility of 8.04%. This indicates that JSCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JSCGXHSPGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.36%

8.04%

-1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.53%

19.23%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.45%

25.34%

+3.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.09%

25.45%

+10.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.72%

25.12%

+7.60%

JSCGX vs. HSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JSCGX has a 1.97% expense ratio, which is higher than HSPGX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

JSCGX vs. HSPGX - Dividend Comparison

JSCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HSPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.27%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HSPGX
Emerald Growth Fund
10.27%12.74%21.85%6.43%8.77%19.11%8.48%1.45%11.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JSCGX
Jacob Small Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%18.09%13.69%2.57%1.13%0.00%0.00%0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


JSCGX and HSPGX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HSPGX has higher volatility (8.04%) compared to JSCGX (6.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSCGX dropped -70.07% vs HSPGX's -60.28%.

HSPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JSCGX and HSPGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer