JSCGX vs. HSPGX
JSCGX (Jacob Small Cap Growth Fund) and HSPGX (Emerald Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, JSCGX returned 6.60%/yr vs 15.38%/yr for HSPGX. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. JSCGX charges 1.97%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for HSPGX.
Performance
JSCGX vs. HSPGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JSCGX achieves a -25.96% return, which is significantly lower than HSPGX's 23.61% return. Over the past 10 years, JSCGX has underperformed HSPGX with an annualized return of 6.60%, while HSPGX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.38% annualized return.
JSCGX
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -6.47%
- 6M
- -16.13%
- YTD
- -25.96%
- 1Y
- -6.43%
- 3Y*
- 6.20%
- 5Y*
- -8.61%
- 10Y*
- 6.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.28%
HSPGX
- 1D
- 3.23%
- 1M
- -7.25%
- 6M
- 17.08%
- YTD
- 23.61%
- 1Y
- 51.73%
- 3Y*
- 27.70%
- 5Y*
- 13.07%
- 10Y*
- 15.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.95%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
HSPGX Emerald Growth Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
JSCGX vs. HSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSCGX Jacob Small Cap Growth Fund | -25.96% | 41.65% | 12.89% | 18.74% | -50.37% | -0.60% | 60.95% | 20.04% | 8.26% | 20.61% |
HSPGX Emerald Growth Fund | 23.61% | 31.62% | 28.04% | 18.66% | -24.65% | 3.59% | 38.49% | 28.33% | -12.16% | 27.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between JSCGX and HSPGX is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2010 | 0.83 |
Over the past year, the correlation between JSCGX and HSPGX has dropped to 0.62 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JSCGX vs. HSPGX — Risk / Return Rank
JSCGX
HSPGX
JSCGX vs. HSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jacob Small Cap Growth Fund (JSCGX) and Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JSCGX | HSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.29 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.28 | 3.44 | -3.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.50 | 12.12 | -12.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JSCGX vs. HSPGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JSCGX drawdown since its inception was -70.07%, which is greater than HSPGX's maximum drawdown of -60.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSCGX and HSPGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JSCGX | HSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.07% | -60.28% | -9.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.69% | -14.41% | -18.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.69% | -28.63% | -4.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.86% | -38.65% | -29.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.07% | -41.48% | -28.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.66% | -10.45% | -38.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.30% | -18.94% | -6.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.20% | 4.07% | +14.13% |
Volatility
JSCGX vs. HSPGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Jacob Small Cap Growth Fund (JSCGX) is 6.85%, while Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) has a volatility of 8.22%. This indicates that JSCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JSCGX | HSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.85% | 8.22% | -1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.49% | 21.56% | -0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.83% | 27.62% | +1.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.28% | 25.90% | +10.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.78% | 25.30% | +7.48% |
JSCGX vs. HSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JSCGX has a 1.97% expense ratio, which is higher than HSPGX's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
JSCGX vs. HSPGX - Dividend Comparison
JSCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HSPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.31%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSPGX Emerald Growth Fund | 10.31% | 12.74% | 21.85% | 6.43% | 8.77% | 19.11% | 8.48% | 1.45% | 11.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JSCGX Jacob Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 18.09% | 13.69% | 2.57% | 1.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JSCGX and HSPGX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HSPGX has higher volatility (8.22%) compared to JSCGX (6.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSCGX dropped -70.07% vs HSPGX's -60.28%.
HSPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JSCGX and HSPGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer