JRSIX vs. GTLOX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

JRSIX (Janus Henderson Adaptive Risk Managed U.S. Equity Fund) and GTLOX (Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, JRSIX returned 11.09%/yr vs 12.11%/yr for GTLOX. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. JRSIX charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for GTLOX.

Performance

JRSIX vs. GTLOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Adaptive Risk Managed U.S. Equity Fund (JRSIX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRSIX achieves a 5.66% return, which is significantly lower than GTLOX's 20.80% return. Over the past 10 years, JRSIX has underperformed GTLOX with an annualized return of 11.09%, while GTLOX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.11% annualized return.

JRSIX

• 1D: 1.26%
• 1M: -0.31%
• 6M: 3.87%
• YTD: 5.66%
• 1Y: 14.33%
• 3Y*: 15.69%
• 5Y*: 9.59%
• 10Y*: 11.09%
• ALL TIME*: 9.12%

GTLOX

• 1D: 1.19%
• 1M: 0.25%
• 6M: 16.60%
• YTD: 20.80%
• 1Y: 38.19%
• 3Y*: 17.56%
• 5Y*: 10.57%
• 10Y*: 12.11%
• ALL TIME*: 10.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GTLOX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
JRSIX Janus Henderson Adaptive Risk Managed U.S. Equity Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

JRSIX vs. GTLOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JRSIX Janus Henderson Adaptive Risk Managed U.S. Equity Fund	5.66%	13.42%	26.89%	15.37%	-14.15%	19.83%	12.78%	23.51%	-3.68%	20.55%
GTLOX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio	20.80%	14.39%	13.86%	16.66%	-15.37%	27.05%	7.41%	23.27%	-7.97%	24.78%

Correlation

The correlation between JRSIX and GTLOX is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006	0.90

The correlation between JRSIX and GTLOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

JRSIX vs. GTLOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JRSIX

JRSIX Risk / Return Rank: 28
JRSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
JRSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
JRSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
JRSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
JRSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

GTLOX

GTLOX Risk / Return Rank: 92
GTLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
GTLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
GTLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
GTLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
GTLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JRSIX vs. GTLOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Adaptive Risk Managed U.S. Equity Fund (JRSIX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JRSIX	GTLOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.97	2.41	-1.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.41	3.28	-1.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.41	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.25	4.80	-3.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.33	19.41	-14.09

JRSIX vs. GTLOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRSIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the GTLOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRSIX and GTLOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JRSIX vs. GTLOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRSIX drawdown since its inception was -56.71%, roughly equal to the maximum GTLOX drawdown of -54.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRSIX and GTLOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JRSIX	GTLOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.71%	-54.09%	-2.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.82%	-7.47%	-2.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.20%	-32.85%	+14.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.60%	-32.85%	+10.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.24%	-38.15%	+0.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.86%	-1.67%	-1.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.52%	-8.28%	+0.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.31%	1.87%	+0.44%

Volatility

JRSIX vs. GTLOX - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Adaptive Risk Managed U.S. Equity Fund (JRSIX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX) have volatilities of 3.33% and 3.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JRSIX	GTLOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.33%	3.35%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.19%	11.66%	-1.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.63%	14.89%	-2.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.63%	21.97%	-6.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.24%	20.92%	-3.68%

JRSIX vs. GTLOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JRSIX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than GTLOX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

JRSIX vs. GTLOX - Dividend Comparison

JRSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.54%, less than GTLOX's 14.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GTLOX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio	14.76%	17.84%	25.96%	8.32%	23.58%	13.35%	9.06%	5.35%	10.53%	4.99%	1.08%	2.09%
JRSIX Janus Henderson Adaptive Risk Managed U.S. Equity Fund	9.54%	10.08%	6.63%	3.76%	2.56%	29.82%	12.97%	3.25%	8.38%	6.00%	1.48%	15.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JRSIX and GTLOX in my portfolio?

JRSIX and GTLOX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JRSIX or GTLOX?

GTLOX has higher volatility (3.35%) compared to JRSIX (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JRSIX dropped -56.71% vs GTLOX's -54.09%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GTLOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.