JRSIX vs. FASGX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

JRSIX (Janus Henderson Adaptive Risk Managed U.S. Equity Fund) and FASGX (Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund) are both mutual funds - JRSIX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by BlackRock, while FASGX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, JRSIX returned 11.09%/yr vs 9.58%/yr for FASGX. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. JRSIX charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for FASGX.

Performance

JRSIX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Adaptive Risk Managed U.S. Equity Fund (JRSIX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRSIX achieves a 5.66% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's 10.24% return. Over the past 10 years, JRSIX has outperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 11.09%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.58% annualized return.

JRSIX

• 1D: 1.26%
• 1M: -0.31%
• 6M: 3.87%
• YTD: 5.66%
• 1Y: 14.33%
• 3Y*: 15.69%
• 5Y*: 9.59%
• 10Y*: 11.09%
• ALL TIME*: 9.12%

FASGX

• 1D: 1.69%
• 1M: -0.72%
• 6M: 7.00%
• YTD: 10.24%
• 1Y: 20.53%
• 3Y*: 14.25%
• 5Y*: 7.62%
• 10Y*: 9.58%
• ALL TIME*: 8.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
JRSIX Janus Henderson Adaptive Risk Managed U.S. Equity Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

JRSIX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JRSIX Janus Henderson Adaptive Risk Managed U.S. Equity Fund	5.66%	13.42%	26.89%	15.37%	-14.15%	19.83%	12.78%	23.51%	-3.68%	20.55%
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund	10.24%	18.23%	10.81%	16.45%	-16.83%	13.98%	17.19%	22.81%	-7.65%	17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between JRSIX and FASGX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006	0.90

The correlation between JRSIX and FASGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JRSIX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JRSIX

JRSIX Risk / Return Rank: 28
JRSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
JRSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
JRSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
JRSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
JRSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

FASGX

FASGX Risk / Return Rank: 75
FASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
FASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
FASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
FASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JRSIX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Adaptive Risk Managed U.S. Equity Fund (JRSIX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JRSIX	FASGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.97	1.66	-0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.41	2.35	-0.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.30	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.25	2.41	-1.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.33	10.13	-4.80

JRSIX vs. FASGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRSIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the FASGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRSIX and FASGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JRSIX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRSIX drawdown since its inception was -56.71%, which is greater than FASGX's maximum drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRSIX and FASGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JRSIX	FASGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.71%	-47.35%	-9.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.82%	-7.95%	-1.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.20%	-12.80%	-5.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.60%	-23.54%	+0.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.24%	-27.20%	-10.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.86%	-1.63%	-1.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.52%	-6.69%	-0.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.31%	1.89%	+0.42%

Volatility

JRSIX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Adaptive Risk Managed U.S. Equity Fund (JRSIX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) have volatilities of 3.33% and 3.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JRSIX	FASGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.33%	3.33%	0.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.19%	9.76%	+0.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.63%	11.54%	+1.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.63%	12.46%	+3.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.24%	12.68%	+4.56%

JRSIX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JRSIX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

JRSIX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison

JRSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.54%, more than FASGX's 6.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund	6.65%	7.33%	4.60%	1.72%	6.69%	2.73%	2.20%	5.19%	6.31%	2.75%	0.20%	5.58%
JRSIX Janus Henderson Adaptive Risk Managed U.S. Equity Fund	9.54%	10.08%	6.63%	3.76%	2.56%	29.82%	12.97%	3.25%	8.38%	6.00%	1.48%	15.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JRSIX and FASGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, JRSIX and FASGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, JRSIX or FASGX?

FASGX has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to JRSIX (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JRSIX dropped -56.71% vs FASGX's -47.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.