PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JRI vs. LQDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JRI vs. LQDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Real Asset Income and Growth Fund (JRI) and iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (LQDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRI achieves a -0.76% return, which is significantly lower than LQDW's 1.25% return.


JRI

1D
-0.16%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
-0.76%
6M
-0.44%
1Y
11.63%
3Y*
16.97%
5Y*
6.17%
10Y*
7.16%

LQDW

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.83%
YTD
1.25%
6M
1.65%
1Y
6.49%
3Y*
3.79%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRI vs. LQDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
JRI
Nuveen Real Asset Income and Growth Fund
-0.76%26.76%16.27%10.08%-11.93%
LQDW
iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF
1.25%9.05%2.60%3.99%-6.78%

Correlation

The correlation between JRI and LQDW is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2022

0.36

The correlation between JRI and LQDW shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JRI vs. LQDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRI
JRI Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
JRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRI Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
JRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRI Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

LQDW
LQDW Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
LQDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQDW Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
LQDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQDW Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRI vs. LQDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Real Asset Income and Growth Fund (JRI) and iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (LQDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JRILQDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.38

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

2.51

-1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.35

9.39

-6.04

JRI vs. LQDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRI Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the LQDW Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRI and LQDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JRILQDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

1.85

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.46

-0.09

Drawdowns

JRI vs. LQDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRI drawdown since its inception was -60.74%, which is greater than LQDW's maximum drawdown of -9.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRI and LQDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JRILQDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.74%

-9.20%

-51.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.92%

-2.59%

-10.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.35%

-6.74%

-8.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.97%

-0.35%

-2.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.05%

-2.35%

-6.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

0.69%

+2.79%

Volatility

JRI vs. LQDW - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Real Asset Income and Growth Fund (JRI) has a higher volatility of 6.38% compared to iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (LQDW) at 1.46%. This indicates that JRI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JRILQDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.38%

1.46%

+4.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.50%

3.02%

+9.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.55%

3.53%

+11.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.40%

5.49%

+11.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.29%

5.49%

+15.80%

JRI vs. LQDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

JRI has a 2.09% expense ratio, which is higher than LQDW's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

JRI vs. LQDW - Dividend Comparison

JRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.51%, which matches LQDW's 12.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JRI
Nuveen Real Asset Income and Growth Fund
12.51%11.77%11.83%9.18%9.90%7.18%9.06%7.05%9.33%7.21%8.57%10.33%
LQDW
iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF
12.57%16.02%15.74%19.28%8.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JRI and LQDW have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JRI has higher volatility (6.38%) compared to LQDW (1.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JRI dropped -60.74% vs LQDW's -9.20%.

LQDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JRI and LQDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer