PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JRI vs. BSTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

JRI vs. BSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Real Asset Income and Growth Fund (JRI) and BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust (BSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRI achieves a 2.98% return, which is significantly lower than BSTZ's 31.54% return.


JRI

1D
0.70%
1M
0.71%
6M
6.11%
YTD
2.98%
1Y
12.31%
3Y*
17.14%
5Y*
6.55%
10Y*
6.73%
ALL TIME*
7.52%

BSTZ

1D
1.75%
1M
-2.73%
6M
31.94%
YTD
31.54%
1Y
48.48%
3Y*
27.39%
5Y*
3.54%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.36M$5.75M$6.87M
$1.27M$1.47M$1.72M

JRI vs. BSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JRI
Nuveen Real Asset Income and Growth Fund
2.98%26.76%16.27%10.08%-20.87%29.19%-19.47%14.87%
BSTZ
BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust
31.54%25.06%37.49%18.72%-55.34%12.71%87.46%5.04%

Correlation

The correlation between JRI and BSTZ is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2019

0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between JRI and BSTZ has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

JRI:

$355.73M

BSTZ:

$1.95B

EPS

JRI:

$2.72

BSTZ:

$8.53

PE Ratio

JRI:

4.77

BSTZ:

3.33

PS Ratio

JRI:

4.17

BSTZ:

5.41

PB Ratio

JRI:

0.97

BSTZ:

1.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

JRI:

$85.35M

BSTZ:

$361.49M

Gross Profit (TTM)

JRI:

$56.69M

BSTZ:

$169.67M

EBITDA (TTM)

JRI:

$92.52M

BSTZ:

$586.67M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JRI vs. BSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JRI
JRI Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
JRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRI Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
JRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRI Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

BSTZ
BSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
BSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JRI vs. BSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Real Asset Income and Growth Fund (JRI) and BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust (BSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JRIBSTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.30

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.94

3.08

-2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.46

11.02

-7.56

JRI vs. BSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRI Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the BSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRI and BSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JRI vs. BSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRI drawdown since its inception was -60.74%, roughly equal to the maximum BSTZ drawdown of -60.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRI and BSTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JRIBSTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.74%

-60.51%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.92%

-15.70%

+2.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.73%

-25.31%

+11.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.40%

-60.51%

+31.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-9.76%

+8.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.96%

-27.10%

+18.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

4.37%

-0.88%

Volatility

JRI vs. BSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Real Asset Income and Growth Fund (JRI) is 3.04%, while BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust (BSTZ) has a volatility of 11.22%. This indicates that JRI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JRIBSTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.04%

11.22%

-8.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.20%

24.68%

-12.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.96%

27.75%

-12.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

28.28%

-10.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.27%

30.47%

-9.20%

Dividends

JRI vs. BSTZ - Dividend Comparison

JRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.32%, more than BSTZ's 8.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSTZ
BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust
8.49%12.46%9.75%10.90%14.73%5.14%3.42%2.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JRI
Nuveen Real Asset Income and Growth Fund
12.32%11.77%11.83%9.18%9.90%7.18%9.06%7.05%9.33%7.21%8.57%10.33%

Financials

JRI vs. BSTZ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nuveen Real Asset Income and Growth Fund and BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


JRI and BSTZ have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BSTZ has higher volatility (11.22%) compared to JRI (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JRI dropped -60.74% vs BSTZ's -60.51%.

BSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JRI and BSTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer