PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JREM.DE vs. EIMI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

JREM.DE vs. EIMI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JREM.DE) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

JREM.DE vs. EIMI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
JREM.DE
JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc)
8.08%19.77%12.75%4.21%-15.62%4.87%8.43%24.14%-2.66%
EIMI.L
iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF
6.09%16.48%14.45%7.70%-14.70%6.78%9.01%19.00%-1.69%
Different Trading Currencies

JREM.DE is traded in EUR, while EIMI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EIMI.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JREM.DE achieves a 8.08% return, which is significantly higher than EIMI.L's 6.09% return.


JREM.DE

1D
3.73%
1M
-5.07%
YTD
8.08%
6M
11.86%
1Y
27.32%
3Y*
14.05%
5Y*
4.32%
10Y*

EIMI.L

1D
4.02%
1M
-4.99%
YTD
6.09%
6M
9.70%
1Y
24.99%
3Y*
14.00%
5Y*
5.13%
10Y*
8.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


JREM.DE vs. EIMI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JREM.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than EIMI.L's 0.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

JREM.DE vs. EIMI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JREM.DE
JREM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
JREM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JREM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
JREM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
JREM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
JREM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

EIMI.L
EIMI.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EIMI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIMI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIMI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
EIMI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIMI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JREM.DE vs. EIMI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JREM.DE) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JREM.DEEIMI.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.45

1.36

+0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.96

1.84

+0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.26

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

2.37

+0.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.27

8.12

+1.15

JREM.DE vs. EIMI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JREM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the EIMI.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JREM.DE and EIMI.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JREM.DEEIMI.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45

1.36

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.31

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.36

+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between JREM.DE and EIMI.L is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

JREM.DE vs. EIMI.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither JREM.DE nor EIMI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

JREM.DE vs. EIMI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JREM.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.28%, smaller than the maximum EIMI.L drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JREM.DE and EIMI.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


JREM.DEEIMI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.28%

-38.73%

+8.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.91%

-12.66%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.75%

-35.66%

+9.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.84%

-9.03%

+2.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.90%

-14.21%

+3.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

3.47%

-0.43%

Volatility

JREM.DE vs. EIMI.L - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JREM.DE) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) have volatilities of 7.90% and 8.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


JREM.DEEIMI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.90%

8.31%

-0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.60%

13.42%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.83%

18.36%

+0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.46%

16.34%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.80%

18.29%

+0.51%