JQUA vs. QLV
JQUA (JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF) and QLV (FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund) are both Quality Factor funds - JQUA tracks the JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index while QLV tracks the Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JQUA returned 12.98%/yr vs 10.05%/yr for QLV. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. JQUA charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for QLV.
Performance
JQUA vs. QLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JQUA achieves a 15.84% return, which is significantly higher than QLV's 9.55% return.
JQUA
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- 6M
- 13.59%
- YTD
- 15.84%
- 1Y
- 23.18%
- 3Y*
- 19.27%
- 5Y*
- 12.98%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.80%
QLV
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 1.91%
- 6M
- 6.89%
- YTD
- 9.55%
- 1Y
- 16.70%
- 3Y*
- 15.60%
- 5Y*
- 10.05%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.67%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $27.54M | $28.89M | $36.27M | |
| $571.44K | $481.55K | $516.78K |
JQUA vs. QLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 15.84% | 11.69% | 21.21% | 25.13% | -13.45% | 28.68% | 16.56% | 6.79% |
QLV FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 9.55% | 12.28% | 18.08% | 13.71% | -9.97% | 26.08% | 9.63% | 5.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between JQUA and QLV is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2019 | 0.90 |
Over the past year, the correlation between JQUA and QLV has dropped to 0.64 - well below their long-term average of 0.90, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
JQUA vs. QLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JQUA
QLV
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
JQUA
QLV
Financial Services
JQUA
QLV
Consumer Cyclical
JQUA
QLV
Industrials
JQUA
QLV
Healthcare
JQUA
QLV
Communication Services
JQUA
QLV
Consumer Defensive
JQUA
QLV
Energy
JQUA
QLV
Real Estate
JQUA
QLV
Basic Materials
JQUA
QLV
Utilities
JQUA
QLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JQUA vs. QLV — Risk / Return Rank
JQUA
QLV
JQUA vs. QLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) and FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JQUA | QLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.39 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 2.71 | +0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.35 | 11.17 | +2.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JQUA vs. QLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JQUA drawdown since its inception was -32.92%, roughly equal to the maximum QLV drawdown of -33.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JQUA and QLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JQUA | QLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.92% | -33.71% | +0.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.13% | -6.19% | -0.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.81% | -12.05% | -4.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.47% | -17.93% | -4.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.10% | -3.93% | -0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 1.50% | +0.24% |
Volatility
JQUA vs. QLV - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) has a higher volatility of 2.46% compared to FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) at 2.30%. This indicates that JQUA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JQUA | QLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.46% | 2.30% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.45% | 5.98% | +3.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.01% | 7.88% | +4.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 12.64% | +3.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.92% | 16.43% | +1.49% |
JQUA vs. QLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
JQUA has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than QLV's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JQUA vs. QLV - Dividend Comparison
JQUA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than QLV's 1.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 1.07% | 1.19% | 1.24% | 1.21% | 1.60% | 1.32% | 1.44% | 1.67% | 2.10% | 0.40% |
QLV FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.66% | 1.60% | 1.74% | 0.96% | 1.24% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JQUA and QLV have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JQUA has higher volatility (2.46%) compared to QLV (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JQUA dropped -32.92% vs QLV's -33.71%.
On 5-year performance, JQUA leads with 12.98% vs 10.05% for QLV. On fees, JQUA is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, QLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JQUA has performed better with a 12.98% return vs 10.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JQUA is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for QLV.
QLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 1.07% for JQUA.
JQUA tracks JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index, while QLV tracks Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JQUA and 0.22% for QLV.
QLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JQUA and QLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer