PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JQUA vs. QLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JQUA vs. QLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) and FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JQUA achieves a 15.84% return, which is significantly higher than QLV's 9.55% return.


JQUA

1D
0.79%
1M
1.13%
6M
13.59%
YTD
15.84%
1Y
23.18%
3Y*
19.27%
5Y*
12.98%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.80%

QLV

1D
0.50%
1M
1.91%
6M
6.89%
YTD
9.55%
1Y
16.70%
3Y*
15.60%
5Y*
10.05%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$27.54M$28.89M$36.27M
$571.44K$481.55K$516.78K

JQUA vs. QLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JQUA
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
15.84%11.69%21.21%25.13%-13.45%28.68%16.56%6.79%
QLV
FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
9.55%12.28%18.08%13.71%-9.97%26.08%9.63%5.97%

Correlation

The correlation between JQUA and QLV is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2019

0.90

Over the past year, the correlation between JQUA and QLV has dropped to 0.64 - well below their long-term average of 0.90, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

JQUA vs. QLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JQUA
QLV

Technology

41.0%
30.2%

Financial Services

12.0%
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
6.4%

Industrials

8.9%
6.3%

Healthcare

8.8%
14.1%

Communication Services

6.2%
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
7.8%

Energy

3.3%
6.5%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.4%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.3%

Utilities

1.2%
6.4%

Technology

JQUA
41.0%
QLV
30.2%

Financial Services

JQUA
12.0%
QLV
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

JQUA
9.5%
QLV
6.4%

Industrials

JQUA
8.9%
QLV
6.3%

Healthcare

JQUA
8.8%
QLV
14.1%

Communication Services

JQUA
6.2%
QLV
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

JQUA
5.2%
QLV
7.8%

Energy

JQUA
3.3%
QLV
6.5%

Real Estate

JQUA
2.2%
QLV
1.4%

Basic Materials

JQUA
1.7%
QLV
1.3%

Utilities

JQUA
1.2%
QLV
6.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JQUA vs. QLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JQUA
JQUA Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
JQUA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JQUA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
JQUA Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
JQUA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
JQUA Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

QLV
QLV Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
QLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLV Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
QLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JQUA vs. QLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) and FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JQUAQLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.39

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

2.71

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.35

11.17

+2.18

JQUA vs. QLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JQUA Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the QLV Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JQUA and QLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JQUA vs. QLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JQUA drawdown since its inception was -32.92%, roughly equal to the maximum QLV drawdown of -33.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JQUA and QLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JQUAQLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.92%

-33.71%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.13%

-6.19%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.81%

-12.05%

-4.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.47%

-17.93%

-4.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.10%

-3.93%

-0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

1.50%

+0.24%

Volatility

JQUA vs. QLV - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) has a higher volatility of 2.46% compared to FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) at 2.30%. This indicates that JQUA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JQUAQLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.46%

2.30%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.45%

5.98%

+3.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.01%

7.88%

+4.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.73%

12.64%

+3.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.92%

16.43%

+1.49%

JQUA vs. QLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

JQUA has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than QLV's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JQUA vs. QLV - Dividend Comparison

JQUA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than QLV's 1.52% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
JQUA
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
1.07%1.19%1.24%1.21%1.60%1.32%1.44%1.67%2.10%0.40%
QLV
FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
1.52%1.60%1.66%1.60%1.74%0.96%1.24%0.58%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JQUA and QLV have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JQUA has higher volatility (2.46%) compared to QLV (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JQUA dropped -32.92% vs QLV's -33.71%.

On 5-year performance, JQUA leads with 12.98% vs 10.05% for QLV. On fees, JQUA is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, QLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JQUA has performed better with a 12.98% return vs 10.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JQUA is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for QLV.

QLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 1.07% for JQUA.

JQUA tracks JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index, while QLV tracks Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JQUA and 0.22% for QLV.

QLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JQUA and QLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer