PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JQUA vs. QGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JQUA vs. QGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JQUA achieves a 15.84% return, which is significantly higher than QGRW's 13.60% return.


JQUA

1D
0.79%
1M
1.13%
6M
13.59%
YTD
15.84%
1Y
23.18%
3Y*
19.27%
5Y*
12.98%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.80%

QGRW

1D
2.43%
1M
2.33%
6M
12.72%
YTD
13.60%
1Y
25.74%
3Y*
26.47%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
32.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$27.54M$28.89M$36.27M
$11.72M$14.19M$19.88M

JQUA vs. QGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
JQUA
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
15.84%11.69%21.21%25.13%-3.54%
QGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund
13.60%19.20%34.85%56.05%-3.07%

Correlation

The correlation between JQUA and QGRW is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2022

0.81

The correlation between JQUA and QGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

JQUA vs. QGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JQUA
QGRW

Technology

41.0%
50.7%

Financial Services

12.0%
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
13.4%

Industrials

8.9%
9.3%

Healthcare

8.8%
5.5%

Communication Services

6.2%
15.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
0.5%

Energy

3.3%
0.5%

Real Estate

2.2%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%

-

Utilities

1.2%
0.9%

Technology

JQUA
41.0%
QGRW
50.7%

Financial Services

JQUA
12.0%
QGRW
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

JQUA
9.5%
QGRW
13.4%

Industrials

JQUA
8.9%
QGRW
9.3%

Healthcare

JQUA
8.8%
QGRW
5.5%

Communication Services

JQUA
6.2%
QGRW
15.4%

Consumer Defensive

JQUA
5.2%
QGRW
0.5%

Energy

JQUA
3.3%
QGRW
0.5%

Real Estate

JQUA
2.2%
QGRW

-

Basic Materials

JQUA
1.7%
QGRW

-

Utilities

JQUA
1.2%
QGRW
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JQUA vs. QGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JQUA
JQUA Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
JQUA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JQUA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
JQUA Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
JQUA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
JQUA Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

QGRW
QGRW Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
QGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
QGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
QGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
QGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JQUA vs. QGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JQUAQGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.23

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

1.67

+1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.35

5.72

+7.63

JQUA vs. QGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JQUA Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the QGRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JQUA and QGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JQUA vs. QGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JQUA drawdown since its inception was -32.92%, which is greater than QGRW's maximum drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JQUA and QGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JQUAQGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.92%

-24.40%

-8.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.13%

-15.44%

+8.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.81%

-24.40%

+7.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.89%

+2.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.10%

-3.34%

-0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

4.51%

-2.77%

Volatility

JQUA vs. QGRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) is 2.46%, while WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) has a volatility of 6.27%. This indicates that JQUA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JQUAQGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.46%

6.27%

-3.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.45%

15.99%

-6.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.01%

19.53%

-7.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.73%

21.26%

-5.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.92%

21.26%

-3.34%

JQUA vs. QGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

JQUA has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than QGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

JQUA vs. QGRW - Dividend Comparison

JQUA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, more than QGRW's 0.08% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
JQUA
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
1.07%1.19%1.24%1.21%1.60%1.32%1.44%1.67%2.10%0.40%
QGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund
0.08%0.09%0.14%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JQUA and QGRW have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QGRW has higher volatility (6.27%) compared to JQUA (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JQUA dropped -32.92% vs QGRW's -24.40%.

On 3-year performance, QGRW leads with 26.47% vs 19.27% for JQUA. On fees, JQUA is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JQUA has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, QGRW has performed better with a 26.47% return vs 19.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JQUA is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for QGRW.

JQUA has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.08% for QGRW.

JQUA tracks JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index, while QGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JQUA and 0.28% for QGRW.

JQUA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JQUA and QGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer