JQUA vs. JMOM
JQUA (JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF) and JMOM (JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JQUA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index, while JMOM is a Momentum fund tracking the JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JQUA returned 13.08%/yr vs 15.10%/yr for JMOM. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.12% expense ratio.
Performance
JQUA vs. JMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JQUA achieves a 11.30% return, which is significantly lower than JMOM's 21.70% return.
JQUA
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 11.30%
- 6M
- 10.20%
- 1Y
- 20.17%
- 3Y*
- 19.01%
- 5Y*
- 13.08%
- 10Y*
- —
JMOM
- 1D
- -2.53%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- YTD
- 21.70%
- 6M
- 19.91%
- 1Y
- 34.10%
- 3Y*
- 27.39%
- 5Y*
- 15.10%
- 10Y*
- —
JQUA vs. JMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 11.30% | 11.69% | 21.21% | 25.13% | -13.45% | 28.68% | 16.56% | 28.47% | -2.98% | 5.07% |
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 21.70% | 18.02% | 28.47% | 22.89% | -20.83% | 25.03% | 29.25% | 28.24% | -5.25% | 3.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between JQUA and JMOM is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017 | 0.90 |
The correlation between JQUA and JMOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
JQUA vs. JMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JQUA
JMOM
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
JQUA
JMOM
Financial Services
JQUA
JMOM
Consumer Cyclical
JQUA
JMOM
Industrials
JQUA
JMOM
Healthcare
JQUA
JMOM
Communication Services
JQUA
JMOM
Consumer Defensive
JQUA
JMOM
Energy
JQUA
JMOM
Real Estate
JQUA
JMOM
Basic Materials
JQUA
JMOM
Utilities
JQUA
JMOM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JQUA vs. JMOM — Risk / Return Rank
JQUA
JMOM
JQUA vs. JMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) and JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JQUA | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.38 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 4.35 | -1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.58 | 19.57 | -7.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JQUA vs. JMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JQUA drawdown since its inception was -32.92%, roughly equal to the maximum JMOM drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JQUA and JMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JQUA | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.92% | -34.31% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.13% | -7.87% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.81% | -19.51% | +2.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.47% | -28.26% | +5.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.77% | -2.53% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.15% | -6.29% | +2.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.75% | 1.75% | 0.00% |
Volatility
JQUA vs. JMOM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) is 5.52%, while JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) has a volatility of 7.29%. This indicates that JQUA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JQUA | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.52% | 7.29% | -1.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.51% | 13.12% | -3.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.05% | 15.69% | -3.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.74% | 18.87% | -3.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 20.19% | -2.18% |
JQUA vs. JMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both JQUA and JMOM have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JQUA vs. JMOM - Dividend Comparison
JQUA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, more than JMOM's 0.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.72% | 0.86% | 0.75% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.64% | 0.85% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 0.29% |
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 1.10% | 1.19% | 1.24% | 1.21% | 1.60% | 1.32% | 1.44% | 1.67% | 2.10% | 0.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JQUA and JMOM have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JMOM has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to JQUA (5.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JQUA dropped -32.92% vs JMOM's -34.31%.
On 5-year performance, JMOM leads with 15.10% vs 13.08% for JQUA. Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. On volatility, JQUA has been the lower-risk option at 5.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JMOM has performed better with a 15.10% return vs 13.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JQUA and JMOM have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.
JQUA has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.72% for JMOM.
JQUA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while JMOM is Momentum. JQUA tracks JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index, while JMOM tracks JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index.
JMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JQUA and JMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer