JQUA vs. DFIV
JQUA (JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF) and DFIV (Dimensional International Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JQUA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index, while DFIV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. JQUA is passively managed, while DFIV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, JQUA returned 19.51%/yr vs 23.03%/yr for DFIV. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JQUA charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for DFIV.
Performance
JQUA vs. DFIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JQUA achieves a 11.39% return, which is significantly higher than DFIV's 10.17% return.
JQUA
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- YTD
- 11.39%
- 6M
- 11.55%
- 1Y
- 19.08%
- 3Y*
- 19.51%
- 5Y*
- 13.33%
- 10Y*
- —
DFIV
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- YTD
- 10.17%
- 6M
- 14.07%
- 1Y
- 32.57%
- 3Y*
- 23.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JQUA vs. DFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 11.39% | 11.69% | 21.21% | 25.13% | -13.45% | 7.44% |
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF | 10.17% | 45.36% | 7.26% | 17.75% | -3.70% | 0.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between JQUA and DFIV is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021 | 0.66 |
The correlation between JQUA and DFIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
JQUA vs. DFIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JQUA
DFIV
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
JQUA
DFIV
Financial Services
JQUA
DFIV
Consumer Cyclical
JQUA
DFIV
Industrials
JQUA
DFIV
Healthcare
JQUA
DFIV
Communication Services
JQUA
DFIV
Consumer Defensive
JQUA
DFIV
Energy
JQUA
DFIV
Utilities
JQUA
DFIV
Real Estate
JQUA
DFIV
Basic Materials
JQUA
DFIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JQUA vs. DFIV — Risk / Return Rank
JQUA
DFIV
JQUA vs. DFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JQUA | DFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.42 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.69 | 3.39 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.21 | 13.05 | -1.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JQUA | DFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 2.36 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.91 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
JQUA vs. DFIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JQUA drawdown since its inception was -32.92%, which is greater than DFIV's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JQUA and DFIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JQUA | DFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.92% | -25.42% | -7.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.13% | -9.66% | +2.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.81% | -14.72% | -2.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.69% | -2.23% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.16% | -4.47% | +0.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 2.50% | -0.79% |
Volatility
JQUA vs. DFIV - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) at 3.83%. This indicates that JQUA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JQUA | DFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 3.83% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.82% | 11.26% | -2.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.57% | 13.91% | -2.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.66% | 16.65% | -0.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 16.65% | +1.36% |
JQUA vs. DFIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
JQUA has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than DFIV's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JQUA vs. DFIV - Dividend Comparison
JQUA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than DFIV's 2.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF | 2.59% | 2.92% | 3.88% | 3.93% | 3.84% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 1.10% | 1.19% | 1.24% | 1.21% | 1.60% | 1.32% | 1.44% | 1.67% | 2.10% | 0.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JQUA and DFIV have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JQUA has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to DFIV (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JQUA dropped -32.92% vs DFIV's -25.42%.
On 3-year performance, DFIV leads with 23.03% vs 19.51% for JQUA. On fees, JQUA is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, DFIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFIV has performed better with a 23.03% return vs 19.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JQUA is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for DFIV.
DFIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 1.10% for JQUA.
JQUA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DFIV is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JQUA and 0.27% for DFIV.
DFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JQUA and DFIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer