PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JQUA vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JQUA vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JQUA achieves a 10.93% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 8.20% return.


JQUA

1D
-2.82%
1M
3.22%
YTD
10.93%
6M
10.62%
1Y
19.51%
3Y*
19.44%
5Y*
13.27%
10Y*

BBUS

1D
-2.63%
1M
0.61%
YTD
8.20%
6M
7.84%
1Y
25.30%
3Y*
21.55%
5Y*
12.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JQUA vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JQUA
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
10.93%11.69%21.21%25.13%-13.45%28.68%16.56%14.08%
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
8.20%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%20.69%16.53%

Correlation

The correlation between JQUA and BBUS is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019

0.96

The correlation between JQUA and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

JQUA vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JQUA
BBUS

Technology

41.9%
37.1%

Financial Services

10.2%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
9.4%

Industrials

7.6%
7.2%

Healthcare

7.2%
8.1%

Communication Services

5.5%
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
4.5%

Energy

3.2%
3.2%

Utilities

2.3%
2.6%

Real Estate

2.1%
1.7%

Basic Materials

0.8%
1.2%

Technology

JQUA
41.9%
BBUS
37.1%

Financial Services

JQUA
10.2%
BBUS
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

JQUA
9.2%
BBUS
9.4%

Industrials

JQUA
7.6%
BBUS
7.2%

Healthcare

JQUA
7.2%
BBUS
8.1%

Communication Services

JQUA
5.5%
BBUS
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

JQUA
5.3%
BBUS
4.5%

Energy

JQUA
3.2%
BBUS
3.2%

Utilities

JQUA
2.3%
BBUS
2.6%

Real Estate

JQUA
2.1%
BBUS
1.7%

Basic Materials

JQUA
0.8%
BBUS
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JQUA vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JQUA
JQUA Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
JQUA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JQUA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
JQUA Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
JQUA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
JQUA Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JQUA vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JQUABBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.38

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

2.76

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.52

12.62

-1.10

JQUA vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JQUA Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JQUA and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JQUABBUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

2.09

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.76

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.82

-0.01

Drawdowns

JQUA vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JQUA drawdown since its inception was -32.92%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JQUA and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JQUABBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.92%

-35.35%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.13%

-9.21%

+2.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.81%

-19.01%

+2.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.47%

-25.46%

+2.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.09%

-2.90%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.16%

-5.45%

+1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.70%

2.01%

-0.31%

Volatility

JQUA vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) has a higher volatility of 4.19% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 3.80%. This indicates that JQUA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JQUABBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.19%

3.80%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.82%

9.37%

-0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.57%

12.18%

-0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.66%

17.06%

-1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.01%

19.61%

-1.60%

JQUA vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

JQUA has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JQUA vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

JQUA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, more than BBUS's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
1.00%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%0.00%0.00%
JQUA
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
1.10%1.19%1.24%1.21%1.60%1.32%1.44%1.67%2.10%0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


JQUA and BBUS have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JQUA has higher volatility (4.19%) compared to BBUS (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JQUA dropped -32.92% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 5-year performance, JQUA leads with 13.27% vs 12.93% for BBUS. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JQUA has performed better with a 13.27% return vs 12.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for JQUA.

JQUA has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 1.00% for BBUS.

JQUA tracks JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JQUA and 0.02% for BBUS.

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JQUA and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer