JQC vs. NVLIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC) and Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX).
JQC is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Jun 26, 2003. NVLIX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on May 15, 2009.
Performance
JQC vs. NVLIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JQC vs. NVLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JQC Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund | -0.69% | -0.36% | 22.29% | 15.26% | -14.22% | 13.29% | -2.96% | 21.78% | -4.33% | -0.27% |
NVLIX Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I | -11.60% | 12.76% | 29.48% | 43.60% | -31.31% | 27.62% | 37.97% | 33.54% | 3.02% | 33.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JQC achieves a -0.69% return, which is significantly higher than NVLIX's -11.60% return. Over the past 10 years, JQC has underperformed NVLIX with an annualized return of 6.15%, while NVLIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.48% annualized return.
JQC
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- YTD
- -0.69%
- 6M
- -3.79%
- 1Y
- 2.42%
- 3Y*
- 10.57%
- 5Y*
- 4.84%
- 10Y*
- 6.15%
NVLIX
- 1D
- 3.68%
- 1M
- -6.71%
- YTD
- -11.60%
- 6M
- -11.36%
- 1Y
- 9.95%
- 3Y*
- 18.20%
- 5Y*
- 9.66%
- 10Y*
- 15.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JQC vs. NVLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JQC has a 4.34% expense ratio, which is higher than NVLIX's 0.83% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JQC vs. NVLIX — Risk / Return Rank
JQC
NVLIX
JQC vs. NVLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC) and Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JQC | NVLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.16 | 0.47 | -0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.33 | 0.84 | -0.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.12 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 0.39 | -0.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.35 | 1.29 | -0.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JQC | NVLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 | 0.47 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.43 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.71 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.74 | -0.52 |
Correlation
The correlation between JQC and NVLIX is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
JQC vs. NVLIX - Dividend Comparison
JQC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.32%, less than NVLIX's 25.40% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JQC Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund | 13.32% | 12.91% | 11.39% | 11.42% | 9.71% | 10.03% | 16.11% | 16.14% | 6.53% | 7.42% | 6.99% | 7.51% |
NVLIX Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I | 25.40% | 22.45% | 14.35% | 5.39% | 8.93% | 9.51% | 5.47% | 8.69% | 18.81% | 18.70% | 17.11% | 15.18% |
Drawdowns
JQC vs. NVLIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JQC drawdown since its inception was -75.18%, which is greater than NVLIX's maximum drawdown of -39.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JQC and NVLIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JQC | NVLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.18% | -39.57% | -35.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.15% | -19.01% | +8.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.83% | -39.57% | +19.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.99% | -39.57% | -8.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.67% | -16.03% | +9.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.84% | -6.20% | -2.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.67% | 5.80% | -1.13% |
Volatility
JQC vs. NVLIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC) is 6.02%, while Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX) has a volatility of 6.85%. This indicates that JQC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JQC | NVLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.02% | 6.85% | -0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.36% | 12.64% | -3.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.57% | 22.89% | -7.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.12% | 22.40% | -9.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.56% | 21.99% | -4.43% |