JQC vs. FSCO
JQC (Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund) is Bank Loan fund managed by Nuveen, while FSCO (FS Credit Opportunities Corp.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, JQC returned 10.59%/yr vs 11.67%/yr for FSCO. Their 0.14 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
JQC vs. FSCO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JQC achieves a 1.97% return, which is significantly higher than FSCO's -14.16% return.
JQC
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- 6M
- -1.83%
- YTD
- 1.97%
- 1Y
- -2.16%
- 3Y*
- 10.59%
- 5Y*
- 4.73%
- 10Y*
- 5.56%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.93%
FSCO
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- 6M
- -10.36%
- YTD
- -14.16%
- 1Y
- -23.65%
- 3Y*
- 11.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.07%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.26M | $4.44M | $5.06M | |
| $2.37M | $2.54M | $2.74M |
JQC vs. FSCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JQC Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund | 1.97% | -0.36% | 22.29% | 15.26% | 0.49% |
FSCO FS Credit Opportunities Corp. | -14.16% | 3.68% | 34.88% | 36.98% | -3.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between JQC and FSCO is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2022 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JQC vs. FSCO — Risk / Return Rank
JQC
FSCO
JQC vs. FSCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC) and FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JQC | FSCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 0.86 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.25 | -0.67 | +0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.47 | -1.17 | +0.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JQC vs. FSCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JQC drawdown since its inception was -75.18%, which is greater than FSCO's maximum drawdown of -35.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JQC and FSCO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JQC | FSCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.18% | -35.53% | -39.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.15% | -35.53% | +25.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.37% | -35.53% | +20.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.17% | -25.05% | +20.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.78% | -8.72% | -0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.32% | 20.25% | -14.93% |
Volatility
JQC vs. FSCO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC) is 1.47%, while FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO) has a volatility of 3.65%. This indicates that JQC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JQC | FSCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.47% | 3.65% | -2.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.52% | 22.49% | -13.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.13% | 27.65% | -16.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.08% | 27.85% | -14.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 27.85% | -10.36% |
Dividends
JQC vs. FSCO - Dividend Comparison
JQC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.14%, less than FSCO's 15.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSCO FS Credit Opportunities Corp. | 15.35% | 12.65% | 10.47% | 11.26% | 1.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JQC Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund | 13.14% | 12.91% | 11.39% | 11.42% | 9.71% | 10.03% | 16.11% | 16.14% | 6.53% | 7.42% | 6.99% | 7.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JQC and FSCO have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSCO has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to JQC (1.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JQC dropped -75.18% vs FSCO's -35.53%.
JQC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.23 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JQC and FSCO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer