JPXN vs. GSJY
JPXN (iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF) and GSJY (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - JPXN tracks the JPX-Nikkei Index 400 while GSJY tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JPXN returned 9.05%/yr vs 9.19%/yr for GSJY. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JPXN charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GSJY.
Performance
JPXN vs. GSJY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPXN achieves a 15.82% return, which is significantly higher than GSJY's 13.71% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JPXN having a 9.05% annualized return and GSJY not far ahead at 9.19%.
JPXN
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- 15.82%
- 6M
- 16.06%
- 1Y
- 30.74%
- 3Y*
- 17.95%
- 5Y*
- 8.72%
- 10Y*
- 9.05%
GSJY
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 4.21%
- YTD
- 13.71%
- 6M
- 14.30%
- 1Y
- 30.26%
- 3Y*
- 18.24%
- 5Y*
- 8.87%
- 10Y*
- 9.19%
JPXN vs. GSJY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPXN iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF | 15.82% | 26.03% | 6.48% | 19.69% | -16.29% | 0.16% | 15.12% | 19.40% | -14.87% | 24.41% |
GSJY Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF | 13.71% | 26.22% | 8.89% | 19.18% | -16.15% | 0.41% | 13.81% | 18.29% | -11.56% | 25.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPXN and GSJY is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2016 | 0.94 |
The correlation between JPXN and GSJY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
JPXN vs. GSJY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JPXN
GSJY
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
JPXN
GSJY
Technology
JPXN
GSJY
Financial Services
JPXN
GSJY
Consumer Cyclical
JPXN
GSJY
Communication Services
JPXN
GSJY
Healthcare
JPXN
GSJY
Basic Materials
JPXN
GSJY
Consumer Defensive
JPXN
GSJY
Real Estate
JPXN
GSJY
Utilities
JPXN
GSJY
Energy
JPXN
GSJY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPXN vs. GSJY — Risk / Return Rank
JPXN
GSJY
JPXN vs. GSJY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF (JPXN) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JPXN | GSJY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.29 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 2.16 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.20 | 7.21 | +1.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JPXN | GSJY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 1.56 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.49 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.54 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.55 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
JPXN vs. GSJY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPXN drawdown since its inception was -55.54%, which is greater than GSJY's maximum drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPXN and GSJY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPXN | GSJY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.54% | -32.53% | -23.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.11% | -14.08% | +0.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.95% | -14.96% | +1.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.21% | -32.53% | -0.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.21% | -32.53% | -0.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -2.26% | +1.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.06% | -7.58% | -7.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.76% | 4.21% | -0.45% |
Volatility
JPXN vs. GSJY - Volatility Comparison
iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF (JPXN) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) have volatilities of 4.26% and 4.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPXN | GSJY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.26% | 4.11% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.68% | 15.17% | -0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.76% | 19.44% | -0.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.69% | 18.06% | -0.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.06% | 17.04% | +0.02% |
JPXN vs. GSJY - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPXN has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than GSJY's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPXN vs. GSJY - Dividend Comparison
JPXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, more than GSJY's 1.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSJY Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF | 1.75% | 1.99% | 1.64% | 2.11% | 2.13% | 1.73% | 1.22% | 2.79% | 3.28% | 1.70% | 2.09% | 0.00% |
JPXN iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF | 2.71% | 3.14% | 2.29% | 2.57% | 1.47% | 2.63% | 1.27% | 1.92% | 1.60% | 1.50% | 2.07% | 1.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, JPXN and GSJY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
JPXN has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to GSJY (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPXN dropped -55.54% vs GSJY's -32.53%.
On 10-year performance, GSJY leads with 9.19% vs 9.05% for JPXN. On fees, GSJY is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, GSJY has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GSJY has performed better with a 9.19% return vs 9.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSJY is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for JPXN.
JPXN has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 1.75% for GSJY.
JPXN tracks JPX-Nikkei Index 400, while GSJY tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for JPXN and 0.25% for GSJY.
JPXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JPXN and GSJY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer