JPXN vs. DBJP
JPXN (iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF) and DBJP (Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - JPXN tracks the JPX-Nikkei Index 400 while DBJP tracks the MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JPXN returned 9.33%/yr vs 17.48%/yr for DBJP. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JPXN charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DBJP.
Performance
JPXN vs. DBJP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPXN achieves a 14.58% return, which is significantly lower than DBJP's 21.11% return. Over the past 10 years, JPXN has underperformed DBJP with an annualized return of 9.33%, while DBJP has yielded a comparatively higher 17.48% annualized return.
JPXN
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 14.58%
- 6M
- 14.15%
- 1Y
- 30.40%
- 3Y*
- 17.85%
- 5Y*
- 8.74%
- 10Y*
- 9.33%
DBJP
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 3.53%
- YTD
- 21.11%
- 6M
- 21.43%
- 1Y
- 53.86%
- 3Y*
- 28.48%
- 5Y*
- 21.53%
- 10Y*
- 17.48%
JPXN vs. DBJP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPXN iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF | 14.58% | 26.03% | 6.48% | 19.69% | -16.29% | 0.16% | 15.12% | 19.40% | -14.87% | 24.41% |
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 21.11% | 29.51% | 25.53% | 36.21% | -4.19% | 13.04% | 10.53% | 20.87% | -14.82% | 21.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPXN and DBJP is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2011 | 0.79 |
The correlation between JPXN and DBJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
JPXN vs. DBJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JPXN
DBJP
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
JPXN
DBJP
Technology
JPXN
DBJP
Financial Services
JPXN
DBJP
Consumer Cyclical
JPXN
DBJP
Communication Services
JPXN
DBJP
Healthcare
JPXN
DBJP
Basic Materials
JPXN
DBJP
Consumer Defensive
JPXN
DBJP
Real Estate
JPXN
DBJP
Utilities
JPXN
DBJP
Energy
JPXN
DBJP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPXN vs. DBJP — Risk / Return Rank
JPXN
DBJP
JPXN vs. DBJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF (JPXN) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JPXN | DBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.49 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 5.21 | -2.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.01 | 19.84 | -11.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JPXN vs. DBJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPXN drawdown since its inception was -55.54%, which is greater than DBJP's maximum drawdown of -31.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPXN and DBJP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPXN | DBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.54% | -31.30% | -24.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.11% | -10.39% | -2.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.95% | -21.50% | +7.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.21% | -21.50% | -11.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.21% | -31.30% | -1.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.63% | -4.26% | +0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.03% | -7.27% | -7.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.81% | 2.72% | +1.09% |
Volatility
JPXN vs. DBJP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF (JPXN) is 6.89%, while Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) has a volatility of 7.91%. This indicates that JPXN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPXN | DBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.89% | 7.91% | -1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.85% | 15.44% | +0.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.63% | 19.90% | -0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.88% | 19.18% | -1.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 19.30% | -2.26% |
JPXN vs. DBJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPXN has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than DBJP's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPXN vs. DBJP - Dividend Comparison
JPXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than DBJP's 1.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 1.25% | 2.81% | 2.80% | 5.21% | 0.80% | 2.30% | 2.53% | 2.56% | 3.87% | 2.07% | 1.13% | 5.95% |
JPXN iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF | 2.79% | 3.14% | 2.29% | 2.57% | 1.47% | 2.63% | 1.27% | 1.92% | 1.60% | 1.50% | 2.07% | 1.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPXN and DBJP have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBJP has higher volatility (7.91%) compared to JPXN (6.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPXN dropped -55.54% vs DBJP's -31.30%.
On 10-year performance, DBJP leads with 17.48% vs 9.33% for JPXN. On fees, DBJP is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, JPXN has been the lower-risk option at 6.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DBJP has performed better with a 17.48% return vs 9.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBJP is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for JPXN.
JPXN has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 1.25% for DBJP.
JPXN tracks JPX-Nikkei Index 400, while DBJP tracks MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for JPXN and 0.45% for DBJP.
DBJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JPXN and DBJP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer