JPUS vs. VB
JPUS (JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF) and VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JPUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Equity Index, while VB is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JPUS returned 11.80%/yr vs 11.61%/yr for VB. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JPUS charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VB.
Performance
JPUS vs. VB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPUS achieves a 13.90% return, which is significantly lower than VB's 15.33% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JPUS having a 11.80% annualized return and VB not far behind at 11.61%.
JPUS
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 4.79%
- YTD
- 13.90%
- 6M
- 13.51%
- 1Y
- 23.69%
- 3Y*
- 15.95%
- 5Y*
- 9.85%
- 10Y*
- 11.80%
VB
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 5.17%
- YTD
- 15.33%
- 6M
- 13.69%
- 1Y
- 30.83%
- 3Y*
- 16.14%
- 5Y*
- 6.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.61%
JPUS vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPUS JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF | 13.90% | 11.18% | 13.48% | 10.98% | -8.47% | 29.09% | 7.54% | 25.50% | -6.14% | 20.58% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 15.33% | 8.87% | 14.17% | 18.22% | -17.51% | 17.57% | 19.19% | 27.34% | -9.34% | 16.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPUS and VB is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2015 | 0.86 |
The correlation between JPUS and VB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
JPUS vs. VB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JPUS
VB
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Technology
JPUS
VB
Healthcare
JPUS
VB
Consumer Defensive
JPUS
VB
Real Estate
JPUS
VB
Industrials
JPUS
VB
Utilities
JPUS
VB
Consumer Cyclical
JPUS
VB
Financial Services
JPUS
VB
Basic Materials
JPUS
VB
Energy
JPUS
VB
Communication Services
JPUS
VB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPUS vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank
JPUS
VB
JPUS vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JPUS | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.30 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 3.21 | +0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.15 | 11.80 | +1.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JPUS vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPUS drawdown since its inception was -38.69%, smaller than the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPUS and VB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPUS | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.69% | -59.56% | +20.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.90% | -8.98% | +2.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.96% | -25.36% | +9.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.04% | -28.15% | +9.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.69% | -42.05% | +3.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.81% | -8.43% | +4.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | 2.44% | -0.72% |
Volatility
JPUS vs. VB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) is 3.12%, while Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that JPUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPUS | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 5.41% | -2.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.70% | 12.24% | -4.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.53% | 16.68% | -6.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.52% | 20.80% | -6.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.77% | 21.44% | -4.67% |
JPUS vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPUS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JPUS vs. VB - Dividend Comparison
JPUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than VB's 1.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPUS JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF | 2.00% | 2.27% | 2.12% | 2.26% | 2.35% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 2.09% | 2.16% | 1.25% | 0.77% | 0.48% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.18% | 1.33% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.67% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPUS and VB have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VB has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to JPUS (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPUS dropped -38.69% vs VB's -59.56%.
On 10-year performance, JPUS leads with 11.80% vs 11.61% for VB. On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, JPUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, JPUS has performed better with a 11.80% return vs 11.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for JPUS.
JPUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 1.18% for VB.
JPUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VB is Small Cap Blend Equities. JPUS tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Equity Index, while VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JPUS and 0.05% for VB.
JPUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JPUS and VB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer