PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPUS vs. RAFE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPUS vs. RAFE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) and PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF (RAFE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with JPUS having a 14.38% return and RAFE slightly higher at 15.05%.


JPUS

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.42%
6M
11.13%
YTD
14.38%
1Y
19.96%
3Y*
15.02%
5Y*
10.16%
10Y*
11.34%

RAFE

1D
-0.56%
1M
1.02%
6M
13.19%
YTD
15.05%
1Y
27.32%
3Y*
18.54%
5Y*
11.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPUS vs. RAFE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JPUS
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF
14.38%11.18%13.48%10.98%-8.47%29.09%7.54%1.02%
RAFE
PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF
15.05%17.60%13.81%18.80%-13.76%30.16%5.29%0.43%

Correlation

The correlation between JPUS and RAFE is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2019

0.91

The correlation between JPUS and RAFE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPUS vs. RAFE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPUS
JPUS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
JPUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
JPUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

RAFE
RAFE Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
RAFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RAFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
RAFE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
RAFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
RAFE Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPUS vs. RAFE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) and PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF (RAFE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JPUSRAFEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.43

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

3.68

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.71

14.34

-2.64

JPUS vs. RAFE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the RAFE Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPUS and RAFE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JPUS vs. RAFE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPUS drawdown since its inception was -38.69%, which is greater than RAFE's maximum drawdown of -35.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPUS and RAFE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPUSRAFEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.69%

-35.74%

-2.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.90%

-7.46%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.96%

-16.36%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.04%

-24.28%

+5.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-0.62%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.79%

-6.12%

+2.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

1.91%

-0.20%

Volatility

JPUS vs. RAFE - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) and PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF (RAFE) have volatilities of 2.42% and 2.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPUSRAFEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

2.40%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.58%

8.61%

-1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.40%

11.34%

-0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.47%

15.07%

-0.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.71%

19.32%

-2.61%

JPUS vs. RAFE - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPUS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than RAFE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

JPUS vs. RAFE - Dividend Comparison

JPUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than RAFE's 1.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPUS
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF
1.99%2.27%2.12%2.26%2.35%1.67%1.94%2.09%2.16%1.25%0.77%0.48%
RAFE
PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF
1.50%1.67%1.79%1.81%2.22%1.42%2.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPUS and RAFE have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JPUS has higher volatility (2.42%) compared to RAFE (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPUS dropped -38.69% vs RAFE's -35.74%.

On 5-year performance, RAFE leads with 11.38% vs 10.16% for JPUS. On fees, JPUS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, RAFE has performed better with a 11.38% return vs 10.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JPUS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for RAFE.

JPUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.50% for RAFE.

JPUS tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Equity Index, while RAFE tracks RAFI ESG US Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JPUS and 0.30% for RAFE.

RAFE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPUS and RAFE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer