PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPUS vs. QUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPUS vs. QUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) and State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPUS achieves a 16.20% return, which is significantly higher than QUS's 10.23% return. Over the past 10 years, JPUS has underperformed QUS with an annualized return of 11.51%, while QUS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.54% annualized return.


JPUS

1D
0.53%
1M
1.30%
6M
11.04%
YTD
16.20%
1Y
23.92%
3Y*
15.47%
5Y*
10.18%
10Y*
11.51%
ALL TIME*
12.18%

QUS

1D
0.83%
1M
1.29%
6M
7.60%
YTD
10.23%
1Y
19.80%
3Y*
17.10%
5Y*
10.91%
10Y*
13.54%
ALL TIME*
12.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$730.62K$1.08M$1.02M
$3.01M$4.81M$3.43M

JPUS vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPUS
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF
16.20%11.18%13.48%10.98%-8.47%29.09%7.54%25.50%-6.14%20.58%
QUS
State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
10.23%14.13%18.99%21.78%-14.15%26.72%12.40%32.45%-3.66%21.67%

Correlation

The correlation between JPUS and QUS is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2015

0.86

The correlation between JPUS and QUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

JPUS vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JPUS
QUS

Healthcare

12.7%
14.4%

Consumer Defensive

11.1%
8.3%

Real Estate

10.7%
1.6%

Utilities

10.0%
3.9%

Technology

9.5%
28.4%

Financial Services

8.8%
15.7%

Industrials

8.7%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
5.7%

Energy

7.3%
3.3%

Basic Materials

7.2%
2.2%

Communication Services

4.3%
8.2%

Healthcare

JPUS
12.7%
QUS
14.4%

Consumer Defensive

JPUS
11.1%
QUS
8.3%

Real Estate

JPUS
10.7%
QUS
1.6%

Utilities

JPUS
10.0%
QUS
3.9%

Technology

JPUS
9.5%
QUS
28.4%

Financial Services

JPUS
8.8%
QUS
15.7%

Industrials

JPUS
8.7%
QUS
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

JPUS
8.4%
QUS
5.7%

Energy

JPUS
7.3%
QUS
3.3%

Basic Materials

JPUS
7.2%
QUS
2.2%

Communication Services

JPUS
4.3%
QUS
8.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPUS vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JPUS
JPUS Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
JPUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
JPUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

QUS
QUS Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
QUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
QUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JPUS vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) and State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JPUSQUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.39

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

2.90

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.32

12.95

+1.37

JPUS vs. QUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the QUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPUS and QUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JPUS vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPUS drawdown since its inception was -38.69%, which is greater than QUS's maximum drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPUS and QUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPUSQUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.69%

-33.78%

-4.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.90%

-6.85%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.96%

-13.94%

-2.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.04%

-22.30%

+3.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.69%

-33.78%

-4.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

0.00%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.77%

-3.66%

-0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

1.53%

+0.14%

Volatility

JPUS vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) and State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) have volatilities of 2.47% and 2.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPUSQUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.47%

2.42%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.66%

6.97%

+0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.30%

9.22%

+1.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.45%

14.32%

+0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.72%

16.40%

+0.32%

JPUS vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPUS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JPUS vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison

JPUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, more than QUS's 1.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPUS
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF
1.96%2.27%2.12%2.26%2.35%1.67%1.94%2.09%2.16%1.25%0.77%0.48%
QUS
State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
1.27%1.38%1.49%1.57%1.68%1.27%1.73%1.81%2.12%1.86%2.07%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPUS and QUS have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JPUS has higher volatility (2.47%) compared to QUS (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPUS dropped -38.69% vs QUS's -33.78%.

On 10-year performance, QUS leads with 13.54% vs 11.51% for JPUS. On fees, QUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QUS has performed better with a 13.54% return vs 11.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for JPUS.

JPUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 1.27% for QUS.

JPUS tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Equity Index, while QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JPUS and 0.15% for QUS.

JPUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPUS and QUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer