JPUS vs. PSCX
JPUS (JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF) and PSCX (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. JPUS is passively managed, while PSCX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, JPUS returned 9.40%/yr vs 8.46%/yr for PSCX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JPUS charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PSCX.
Performance
JPUS vs. PSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPUS achieves a 11.55% return, which is significantly higher than PSCX's 5.11% return.
JPUS
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 11.55%
- 6M
- 11.59%
- 1Y
- 20.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.97%
- 5Y*
- 9.40%
- 10Y*
- 11.49%
PSCX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- YTD
- 5.11%
- 6M
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- 15.49%
- 3Y*
- 12.85%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- —
JPUS vs. PSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPUS JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF | 11.55% | 11.18% | 13.48% | 10.98% | -8.47% | 29.09% | 0.94% |
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF | 5.11% | 12.08% | 13.27% | 16.57% | -7.35% | 9.03% | 0.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPUS and PSCX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2020 | 0.75 |
The correlation between JPUS and PSCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JPUS vs. PSCX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JPUS
PSCX
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
JPUS
PSCX
Healthcare
JPUS
PSCX
Consumer Defensive
JPUS
PSCX
Real Estate
JPUS
PSCX
Industrials
JPUS
PSCX
Utilities
JPUS
PSCX
Consumer Cyclical
JPUS
PSCX
Financial Services
JPUS
PSCX
Energy
JPUS
PSCX
Basic Materials
JPUS
PSCX
Communication Services
JPUS
PSCX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPUS vs. PSCX — Risk / Return Rank
JPUS
PSCX
JPUS vs. PSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JPUS | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.58 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 3.70 | -0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.12 | 18.94 | -6.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JPUS | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 2.82 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 1.20 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 1.27 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
JPUS vs. PSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPUS drawdown since its inception was -38.69%, which is greater than PSCX's maximum drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPUS and PSCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPUS | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.69% | -10.20% | -28.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.90% | -4.20% | -2.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.96% | -9.61% | -6.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.04% | -10.20% | -8.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -0.12% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -1.87% | -1.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | 0.82% | +0.90% |
Volatility
JPUS vs. PSCX - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) has a higher volatility of 2.90% compared to Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) at 0.89%. This indicates that JPUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPUS | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | 0.89% | +2.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.58% | 4.21% | +3.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.41% | 5.53% | +4.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.50% | 7.07% | +7.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 6.96% | +9.80% |
JPUS vs. PSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPUS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPUS vs. PSCX - Dividend Comparison
JPUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, while PSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPUS JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF | 2.04% | 2.27% | 2.12% | 2.26% | 2.35% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 2.09% | 2.16% | 1.25% | 0.77% | 0.48% |
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPUS and PSCX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JPUS has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to PSCX (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPUS dropped -38.69% vs PSCX's -10.20%.
On 5-year performance, JPUS leads with 9.40% vs 8.46% for PSCX. On fees, JPUS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, PSCX has been the lower-risk option at 0.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JPUS has performed better with a 9.40% return vs 8.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JPUS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSCX.
JPUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.00% for PSCX.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JPUS and 0.75% for PSCX.
PSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JPUS and PSCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer