JPUS vs. FMDE
JPUS (JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF) and FMDE (Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JPUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Equity Index, while FMDE is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. JPUS is passively managed, while FMDE is actively managed. Over the past year, JPUS returned 19.87% vs 17.86% for FMDE. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JPUS charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for FMDE.
Performance
JPUS vs. FMDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPUS achieves a 10.87% return, which is significantly higher than FMDE's 8.21% return.
JPUS
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.86%
- YTD
- 10.87%
- 6M
- 11.70%
- 1Y
- 19.87%
- 3Y*
- 15.41%
- 5Y*
- 9.35%
- 10Y*
- 11.36%
FMDE
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 8.21%
- 6M
- 8.53%
- 1Y
- 17.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JPUS vs. FMDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JPUS JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF | 10.87% | 11.18% | 13.48% | 6.69% |
FMDE Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF | 8.21% | 12.19% | 21.76% | 8.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPUS and FMDE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023 | 0.87 |
The correlation between JPUS and FMDE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
JPUS vs. FMDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JPUS
FMDE
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
JPUS
FMDE
Healthcare
JPUS
FMDE
Consumer Defensive
JPUS
FMDE
Real Estate
JPUS
FMDE
Industrials
JPUS
FMDE
Utilities
JPUS
FMDE
Consumer Cyclical
JPUS
FMDE
Financial Services
JPUS
FMDE
Energy
JPUS
FMDE
Basic Materials
JPUS
FMDE
Communication Services
JPUS
FMDE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPUS vs. FMDE — Risk / Return Rank
JPUS
FMDE
JPUS vs. FMDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) and Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JPUS | FMDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.23 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 2.15 | +0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.60 | 8.49 | +3.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JPUS | FMDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.92 | 1.31 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 1.28 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
JPUS vs. FMDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPUS drawdown since its inception was -38.69%, which is greater than FMDE's maximum drawdown of -21.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPUS and FMDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPUS | FMDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.69% | -21.10% | -17.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.90% | -8.33% | +1.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.02% | -2.19% | +1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.82% | -2.64% | -1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | 2.11% | -0.39% |
Volatility
JPUS vs. FMDE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) is 2.55%, while Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE) has a volatility of 3.52%. This indicates that JPUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPUS | FMDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.55% | 3.52% | -0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.61% | 10.03% | -2.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.40% | 13.75% | -3.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 16.15% | -1.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 16.15% | +0.61% |
JPUS vs. FMDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPUS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FMDE's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JPUS vs. FMDE - Dividend Comparison
JPUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, more than FMDE's 1.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMDE Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF | 1.13% | 1.23% | 1.11% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JPUS JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF | 2.06% | 2.27% | 2.12% | 2.26% | 2.35% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 2.09% | 2.16% | 1.25% | 0.77% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPUS and FMDE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FMDE has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to JPUS (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPUS dropped -38.69% vs FMDE's -21.10%.
On 1-year performance, JPUS leads with 19.87% vs 17.86% for FMDE. On fees, JPUS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, JPUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, JPUS has performed better with a 19.87% return vs 17.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JPUS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for FMDE.
JPUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 1.13% for FMDE.
JPUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FMDE is Mid Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JPUS and 0.23% for FMDE.
JPUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JPUS and FMDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer