PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPTC.L vs. NLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPTC.L vs. NLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan Carbon Transition Global Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JPTC.L) and VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Different Trading Currencies

JPTC.L is traded in GBp, while NLR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NLR values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPTC.L achieves a -3.48% return, which is significantly lower than NLR's 9.67% return.


JPTC.L

1D
0.08%
1M
-3.17%
YTD
-3.48%
6M
-0.65%
1Y
23.48%
3Y*
12.70%
5Y*
10.51%
10Y*

NLR

1D
0.12%
1M
-7.38%
YTD
9.67%
6M
-1.24%
1Y
87.15%
3Y*
34.52%
5Y*
24.54%
10Y*
14.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPTC.L vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JPTC.L
JPMorgan Carbon Transition Global Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc)
-3.48%11.44%20.36%16.17%-8.74%25.32%0.92%
NLR
VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF
9.67%45.35%16.26%29.84%14.45%14.70%-0.01%

Correlation

The correlation between JPTC.L and NLR is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners. Combining low-correlation assets is one of the most reliable ways to reduce portfolio risk without sacrificing expected returns.


JPTC.L vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPTC.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than NLR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPTC.L vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPTC.L

NLR
NLR Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
NLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
NLR Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
NLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
NLR Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPTC.L vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Carbon Transition Global Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JPTC.L) and VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPTC.LNLRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.97

1.96

-0.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.43

2.55

-1.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.31

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

3.20

-0.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.30

8.01

+1.30

JPTC.L vs. NLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPTC.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the NLR Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPTC.L and NLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPTC.LNLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

1.96

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.92

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.29

+0.67

Drawdowns

JPTC.L vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPTC.L drawdown since its inception was -19.17%, smaller than the maximum NLR drawdown of -53.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPTC.L and NLR.


Loading graphics...

Volatility

JPTC.L vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Carbon Transition Global Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JPTC.L) is 4.53%, while VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) has a volatility of 11.57%. This indicates that JPTC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


JPTC.LNLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.53%

11.57%

-7.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.76%

32.19%

-23.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.91%

41.26%

-26.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.38%

26.87%

-11.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.38%

23.07%

-7.69%

Dividends

JPTC.L vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison

JPTC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPTC.L
JPMorgan Carbon Transition Global Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NLR
VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF
2.37%2.55%0.76%4.54%2.02%1.99%2.23%2.21%3.91%4.86%3.62%3.30%