JPTC.L vs. BRK-B
JPTC.L (JPMorgan Carbon Transition Global Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc)) is Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, JPTC.L returned 11.69%/yr vs 11.38%/yr for BRK-B. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
JPTC.L vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
JPTC.L is traded in GBp, while BRK-B is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BRK-B values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPTC.L achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-B's -5.08% return.
JPTC.L
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 4.58%
- YTD
- 6.75%
- 6M
- 6.98%
- 1Y
- 21.63%
- 3Y*
- 15.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.69%
- 10Y*
- —
BRK-B
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.02%
- YTD
- -5.08%
- 6M
- -6.22%
- 1Y
- -2.28%
- 3Y*
- 10.25%
- 5Y*
- 11.38%
- 10Y*
- 13.69%
JPTC.L vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPTC.L JPMorgan Carbon Transition Global Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc) | 6.75% | 11.44% | 20.36% | 16.17% | -8.74% | 25.32% | 0.92% |
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | -4.39% | 2.99% | 29.31% | 9.69% | 15.59% | 30.17% | -3.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPTC.L and BRK-B is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2020 | 0.20 |
The correlation between JPTC.L and BRK-B shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPTC.L vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank
JPTC.L
BRK-B
JPTC.L vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Carbon Transition Global Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JPTC.L) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JPTC.L | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 0.99 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | -0.19 | +2.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.17 | -0.42 | +10.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JPTC.L | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | -0.15 | +2.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.01 | 0.68 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 0.59 | +0.53 |
Drawdowns
JPTC.L vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPTC.L drawdown since its inception was -19.17%, smaller than the maximum BRK-B drawdown of -37.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPTC.L and BRK-B.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPTC.L | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.17% | -37.92% | +18.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.69% | -11.88% | +3.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.17% | -17.26% | -1.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.17% | -20.84% | +1.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -14.52% | +14.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.84% | -7.39% | +4.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 5.50% | -3.38% |
Volatility
JPTC.L vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Carbon Transition Global Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JPTC.L) is 2.56%, while Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) has a volatility of 3.82%. This indicates that JPTC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPTC.L | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.56% | 3.82% | -1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.25% | 11.92% | -3.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.04% | 15.39% | -4.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.19% | 16.89% | -1.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.23% | 19.85% | -4.62% |
Dividends
JPTC.L vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison
Neither JPTC.L nor BRK-B has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
JPTC.L and BRK-B have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for JPTC.L and BRK-B
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer