JPTBX vs. FFFCX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

JPTBX (JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2055 Fund) and FFFCX (Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, JPTBX returned 10.71%/yr vs 5.49%/yr for FFFCX. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. JPTBX charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for FFFCX.

Performance

JPTBX vs. FFFCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2055 Fund (JPTBX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPTBX achieves a 11.03% return, which is significantly higher than FFFCX's 4.24% return. Over the past 10 years, JPTBX has outperformed FFFCX with an annualized return of 10.71%, while FFFCX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.49% annualized return.

JPTBX

• 1D: 1.85%
• 1M: -0.37%
• 6M: 7.69%
• YTD: 11.03%
• 1Y: 22.56%
• 3Y*: 16.28%
• 5Y*: 9.40%
• 10Y*: 10.71%
• ALL TIME*: 10.07%

FFFCX

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: -0.72%
• 6M: 2.71%
• YTD: 4.24%
• 1Y: 8.85%
• 3Y*: 8.02%
• 5Y*: 3.24%
• 10Y*: 5.49%
• ALL TIME*: 6.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FFFCX Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
JPTBX JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2055 Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

JPTBX vs. FFFCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JPTBX JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2055 Fund	11.03%	20.02%	11.95%	22.09%	-17.76%	17.54%	12.93%	24.57%	-8.62%	20.15%
FFFCX Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund	4.24%	11.39%	5.26%	9.82%	-13.21%	5.64%	11.09%	14.34%	-3.74%	12.48%

Correlation

The correlation between JPTBX and FFFCX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.82
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013	0.89

The correlation between JPTBX and FFFCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JPTBX vs. FFFCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JPTBX

JPTBX Risk / Return Rank: 67
JPTBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
JPTBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
JPTBX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
JPTBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
JPTBX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

FFFCX

FFFCX Risk / Return Rank: 72
FFFCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
FFFCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FFFCX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FFFCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
FFFCX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JPTBX vs. FFFCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2055 Fund (JPTBX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JPTBX	FFFCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	1.62	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	2.31	-0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.31	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.30	2.26	+0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.86	9.16	+0.71

JPTBX vs. FFFCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPTBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the FFFCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPTBX and FFFCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JPTBX vs. FFFCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPTBX drawdown since its inception was -32.64%, smaller than the maximum FFFCX drawdown of -36.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPTBX and FFFCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JPTBX	FFFCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.64%	-36.88%	+4.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.00%	-4.00%	-5.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.41%	-4.77%	-10.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.39%	-18.35%	-7.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.64%	-18.35%	-14.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.27%	-1.23%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.23%	-4.55%	+0.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.09%	0.98%	+1.11%

Volatility

JPTBX vs. FFFCX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2055 Fund (JPTBX) has a higher volatility of 3.62% compared to Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX) at 1.76%. This indicates that JPTBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFFCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JPTBX	FFFCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.62%	1.76%	+1.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.66%	4.92%	+5.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.81%	5.60%	+7.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.94%	6.49%	+8.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.56%	6.27%	+9.29%

JPTBX vs. FFFCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPTBX has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than FFFCX's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

JPTBX vs. FFFCX - Dividend Comparison

JPTBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than FFFCX's 4.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFFCX Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund	4.70%	4.97%	2.99%	2.72%	7.23%	9.33%	6.01%	5.78%	6.98%	4.82%	3.22%	3.68%
JPTBX JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2055 Fund	2.00%	2.22%	1.95%	1.83%	1.61%	5.17%	1.14%	2.30%	4.95%	1.90%	2.03%	1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JPTBX and FFFCX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, JPTBX and FFFCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, JPTBX or FFFCX?

JPTBX has higher volatility (3.62%) compared to FFFCX (1.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPTBX dropped -32.64% vs FFFCX's -36.88%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFFCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.