JPSV vs. XSVM
JPSV (Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF) and XSVM (Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JPSV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while XSVM is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index. JPSV is actively managed, while XSVM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JPSV returned 11.47%/yr vs 15.99%/yr for XSVM. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JPSV charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for XSVM.
Performance
JPSV vs. XSVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPSV achieves a 10.39% return, which is significantly lower than XSVM's 16.87% return.
JPSV
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 2.73%
- YTD
- 10.39%
- 6M
- 8.88%
- 1Y
- 16.62%
- 3Y*
- 11.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XSVM
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 16.68%
- 1Y
- 34.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.99%
- 5Y*
- 6.37%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
JPSV vs. XSVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JPSV Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF | 10.39% | 0.63% | 8.73% | 9.72% |
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | 16.87% | 7.47% | 2.30% | 11.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPSV and XSVM is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2023 | 0.94 |
The correlation between JPSV and XSVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
JPSV vs. XSVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JPSV
XSVM
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
JPSV
XSVM
Industrials
JPSV
XSVM
Consumer Cyclical
JPSV
XSVM
Technology
JPSV
XSVM
Real Estate
JPSV
XSVM
Communication Services
JPSV
XSVM
Utilities
JPSV
XSVM
Energy
JPSV
XSVM
Healthcare
JPSV
XSVM
Basic Materials
JPSV
XSVM
Consumer Defensive
JPSV
XSVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPSV vs. XSVM — Risk / Return Rank
JPSV
XSVM
JPSV vs. XSVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF (JPSV) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JPSV | XSVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.33 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 3.46 | -1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.96 | 10.66 | -5.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JPSV | XSVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 1.88 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.36 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
JPSV vs. XSVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPSV drawdown since its inception was -22.78%, smaller than the maximum XSVM drawdown of -62.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPSV and XSVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPSV | XSVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.78% | -62.57% | +39.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.02% | -10.08% | +1.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.78% | -26.21% | +3.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -1.47% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.63% | -11.57% | +5.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.36% | 3.27% | +0.09% |
Volatility
JPSV vs. XSVM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF (JPSV) is 3.80%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) has a volatility of 5.24%. This indicates that JPSV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPSV | XSVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.80% | 5.24% | -1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.99% | 12.05% | -2.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.62% | 18.59% | -2.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.92% | 22.71% | -4.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.92% | 25.09% | -7.17% |
JPSV vs. XSVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPSV has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than XSVM's 0.37% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPSV vs. XSVM - Dividend Comparison
JPSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than XSVM's 1.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPSV Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF | 1.28% | 1.42% | 1.21% | 1.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | 1.81% | 2.29% | 1.69% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.23% | 1.21% | 1.22% | 2.54% | 1.90% | 2.29% | 2.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, JPSV and XSVM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XSVM has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to JPSV (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPSV dropped -22.78% vs XSVM's -62.57%.
On 3-year performance, XSVM leads with 15.99% vs 11.47% for JPSV. On fees, XSVM is cheaper at 0.37% per year. On volatility, JPSV has been the lower-risk option at 3.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XSVM has performed better with a 15.99% return vs 11.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XSVM is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for JPSV.
XSVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 1.28% for JPSV.
JPSV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while XSVM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for JPSV and 0.37% for XSVM.
XSVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JPSV and XSVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer