PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPSV vs. RZV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPSV vs. RZV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF (JPSV) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPSV achieves a 17.70% return, which is significantly lower than RZV's 24.21% return.


JPSV

1D
0.78%
1M
5.25%
YTD
17.70%
6M
15.82%
1Y
24.52%
3Y*
13.80%
5Y*
10Y*

RZV

1D
1.35%
1M
6.98%
YTD
24.21%
6M
22.68%
1Y
44.77%
3Y*
19.35%
5Y*
10.24%
10Y*
11.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPSV vs. RZV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
JPSV
Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF
17.70%0.63%8.73%9.99%
RZV
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF
24.21%8.65%5.06%11.71%

Correlation

The correlation between JPSV and RZV is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2023

0.90

The correlation between JPSV and RZV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

JPSV vs. RZV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JPSV
RZV

Financial Services

25.3%
7.4%

Industrials

12.4%
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
25.9%

Real Estate

9.0%
4.8%

Technology

8.3%
10.5%

Communication Services

6.0%
4.0%

Utilities

5.4%
0.4%

Healthcare

5.2%
8.4%

Energy

5.2%
8.8%

Basic Materials

4.9%
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
7.6%

Financial Services

JPSV
25.3%
RZV
7.4%

Industrials

JPSV
12.4%
RZV
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

JPSV
9.8%
RZV
25.9%

Real Estate

JPSV
9.0%
RZV
4.8%

Technology

JPSV
8.3%
RZV
10.5%

Communication Services

JPSV
6.0%
RZV
4.0%

Utilities

JPSV
5.4%
RZV
0.4%

Healthcare

JPSV
5.2%
RZV
8.4%

Energy

JPSV
5.2%
RZV
8.8%

Basic Materials

JPSV
4.9%
RZV
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

JPSV
2.4%
RZV
7.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPSV vs. RZV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPSV
JPSV Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
JPSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPSV Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
JPSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPSV Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

RZV
RZV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
RZV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RZV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
RZV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
RZV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
RZV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPSV vs. RZV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF (JPSV) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JPSVRZVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.36

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

3.58

-0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.37

11.63

-4.25

JPSV vs. RZV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPSV Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the RZV Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPSV and RZV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JPSV vs. RZV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPSV drawdown since its inception was -22.78%, smaller than the maximum RZV drawdown of -77.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPSV and RZV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPSVRZVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.78%

-77.11%

+54.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.02%

-12.56%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.78%

-29.81%

+7.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.53%

-13.56%

+8.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

3.86%

-0.53%

Volatility

JPSV vs. RZV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF (JPSV) is 3.71%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV) has a volatility of 5.25%. This indicates that JPSV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RZV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPSVRZVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.71%

5.25%

-1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.15%

14.17%

-4.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.59%

20.78%

-5.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.85%

24.33%

-6.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.85%

26.99%

-9.14%

JPSV vs. RZV - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPSV has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than RZV's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

JPSV vs. RZV - Dividend Comparison

JPSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than RZV's 1.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPSV
Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF
1.20%1.42%1.21%1.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RZV
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF
1.42%1.59%1.14%1.13%1.43%0.86%0.63%1.03%2.03%1.02%0.46%1.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPSV and RZV have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RZV has higher volatility (5.25%) compared to JPSV (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPSV dropped -22.78% vs RZV's -77.11%.

On 3-year performance, RZV leads with 19.35% vs 13.80% for JPSV. On fees, RZV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JPSV has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, RZV has performed better with a 19.35% return vs 13.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RZV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for JPSV.

RZV has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 1.20% for JPSV.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for JPSV and 0.35% for RZV.

RZV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPSV and RZV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer