JPSV vs. RZV
JPSV (Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF) and RZV (Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. JPSV is actively managed, while RZV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JPSV returned 11.47%/yr vs 17.71%/yr for RZV. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JPSV charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RZV.
Performance
JPSV vs. RZV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPSV achieves a 10.39% return, which is significantly lower than RZV's 17.78% return.
JPSV
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 2.73%
- YTD
- 10.39%
- 6M
- 8.88%
- 1Y
- 16.62%
- 3Y*
- 11.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RZV
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 3.13%
- YTD
- 17.78%
- 6M
- 15.59%
- 1Y
- 42.30%
- 3Y*
- 17.71%
- 5Y*
- 8.85%
- 10Y*
- 10.65%
JPSV vs. RZV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JPSV Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF | 10.39% | 0.63% | 8.73% | 9.72% |
RZV Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF | 17.78% | 8.65% | 5.06% | 11.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPSV and RZV is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2023 | 0.90 |
The correlation between JPSV and RZV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
JPSV vs. RZV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JPSV
RZV
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
JPSV
RZV
Industrials
JPSV
RZV
Consumer Cyclical
JPSV
RZV
Technology
JPSV
RZV
Real Estate
JPSV
RZV
Communication Services
JPSV
RZV
Utilities
JPSV
RZV
Energy
JPSV
RZV
Healthcare
JPSV
RZV
Basic Materials
JPSV
RZV
Consumer Defensive
JPSV
RZV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPSV vs. RZV — Risk / Return Rank
JPSV
RZV
JPSV vs. RZV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF (JPSV) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JPSV | RZV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.35 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 3.38 | -1.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.96 | 11.02 | -6.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JPSV | RZV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 2.06 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.27 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
JPSV vs. RZV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPSV drawdown since its inception was -22.78%, smaller than the maximum RZV drawdown of -77.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPSV and RZV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPSV | RZV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.78% | -77.11% | +54.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.02% | -12.56% | +3.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.78% | -29.81% | +7.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -60.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -1.04% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.63% | -13.60% | +7.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.36% | 3.85% | -0.49% |
Volatility
JPSV vs. RZV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF (JPSV) is 3.80%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV) has a volatility of 5.21%. This indicates that JPSV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RZV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPSV | RZV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.80% | 5.21% | -1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.99% | 13.66% | -3.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.62% | 20.69% | -5.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.92% | 24.37% | -6.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.92% | 27.04% | -9.12% |
JPSV vs. RZV - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPSV has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than RZV's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPSV vs. RZV - Dividend Comparison
JPSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than RZV's 1.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPSV Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF | 1.28% | 1.42% | 1.21% | 1.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RZV Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF | 1.35% | 1.59% | 1.14% | 1.13% | 1.43% | 0.86% | 0.63% | 1.03% | 2.03% | 1.02% | 0.46% | 1.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPSV and RZV have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RZV has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to JPSV (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPSV dropped -22.78% vs RZV's -77.11%.
On 3-year performance, RZV leads with 17.71% vs 11.47% for JPSV. On fees, RZV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JPSV has been the lower-risk option at 3.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, RZV has performed better with a 17.71% return vs 11.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RZV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for JPSV.
RZV has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 1.28% for JPSV.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for JPSV and 0.35% for RZV.
RZV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JPSV and RZV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer