PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPST vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPST vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPST achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 16.08% return.


JPST

1D
0.06%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.56%
6M
1.76%
1Y
4.34%
3Y*
5.19%
5Y*
3.64%
10Y*

VEA

1D
1.17%
1M
4.79%
YTD
16.08%
6M
17.35%
1Y
32.96%
3Y*
19.14%
5Y*
9.87%
10Y*
10.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPST vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPST
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF
1.56%4.99%5.58%5.13%1.14%0.11%2.18%3.34%2.23%0.98%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
16.08%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%12.18%

Correlation

The correlation between JPST and VEA is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2017

0.12

Over the past year, JPST and VEA have become more correlated (0.34) than their long-term average of 0.12, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPST vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPST
JPST Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
JPST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPST Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPST Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
JPST Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPST Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPST vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JPSTVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+6.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+15.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

4.00

1.36

+2.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

29.30

2.85

+26.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

143.82

10.96

+132.86

JPST vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPST Sharpe Ratio is 8.18, which is higher than the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPST and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JPST vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPST drawdown since its inception was -3.28%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPST and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPSTVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.28%

-60.68%

+57.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.15%

-11.63%

+11.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.30%

-13.45%

+13.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.79%

-29.71%

+28.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.08%

-13.27%

+13.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

3.01%

-2.98%

Volatility

JPST vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) is 0.16%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 6.92%. This indicates that JPST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPSTVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.16%

6.92%

-6.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.36%

14.42%

-14.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53%

16.58%

-16.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.58%

16.73%

-16.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.93%

17.41%

-16.48%

JPST vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPST has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JPST vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

JPST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, more than VEA's 2.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPST
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF
4.25%4.43%5.16%4.79%1.83%0.73%1.43%2.69%2.07%0.96%0.00%0.00%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.59%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPST and VEA have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (6.92%) compared to JPST (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPST dropped -3.28% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 5-year performance, VEA leads with 9.87% vs 3.64% for JPST. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, JPST has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VEA has performed better with a 9.87% return vs 3.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for JPST.

JPST has the higher dividend yield at 4.25%, compared with 2.59% for VEA.

JPST is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JPST and 0.03% for VEA.

JPST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.18 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPST and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer