JPRE vs. ICF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JPRE (JPMorgan Realty Income ETF) and ICF (iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF) are both REIT funds. JPRE is actively managed, while ICF is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JPRE returned 9.52%/yr vs 10.12%/yr for ICF. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JPRE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for ICF.

Performance

JPRE vs. ICF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Realty Income ETF (JPRE) and iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPRE achieves a 9.03% return, which is significantly lower than ICF's 12.19% return.

JPRE

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: -1.51%
• YTD: 9.03%
• 6M: 8.33%
• 1Y: 9.04%
• 3Y*: 9.52%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ICF

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: -0.92%
• YTD: 12.19%
• 6M: 11.56%
• 1Y: 11.29%
• 3Y*: 10.12%
• 5Y*: 3.01%
• 10Y*: 5.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPRE vs. ICF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
JPRE JPMorgan Realty Income ETF	9.03%	1.36%	7.43%	13.41%	-9.96%
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF	12.19%	1.85%	5.30%	10.36%	-11.34%

Correlation

The correlation between JPRE and ICF is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2022	0.98

The correlation between JPRE and ICF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

JPRE vs. ICF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JPRE	ICF
Real Estate	98.1%	100.0%
Basic Materials	0.6%	-
Industrials	0.6%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

JPRE vs. ICF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPRE

JPRE Risk / Return Rank: 22
JPRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
JPRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
JPRE Omega Ratio Rank: 20
JPRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
JPRE Martin Ratio Rank: 25

ICF

ICF Risk / Return Rank: 25
ICF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
ICF Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
ICF Omega Ratio Rank: 22
ICF Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
ICF Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPRE vs. ICF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Realty Income ETF (JPRE) and iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JPRE	ICF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.70	0.84	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.01	1.20	-0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.15	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.18	1.38	-0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.24	3.92	-0.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JPRE vs. ICF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPRE Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is comparable to the ICF Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPRE and ICF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JPRE	ICF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70	0.84	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.27	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.31	-0.04

Drawdowns

JPRE vs. ICF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPRE drawdown since its inception was -23.84%, smaller than the maximum ICF drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPRE and ICF.

Drawdown Indicators

	JPRE	ICF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.84%	-76.74%	+52.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.70%	-8.20%	+0.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.27%	-17.25%	+0.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.74%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.57%	-2.67%	-0.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.16%	-14.18%	+6.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.79%	2.88%	-0.09%

Volatility

JPRE vs. ICF - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Realty Income ETF (JPRE) and iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) have volatilities of 3.86% and 3.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JPRE	ICF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.86%	3.71%	+0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.42%	9.85%	-0.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.98%	13.57%	-0.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.28%	18.91%	-0.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.28%	20.58%	-2.30%

JPRE vs. ICF - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPRE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ICF's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

JPRE vs. ICF - Dividend Comparison

JPRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than ICF's 2.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF	2.48%	2.88%	2.66%	2.76%	2.64%	1.82%	2.38%	2.55%	3.20%	3.10%	4.21%	3.30%
JPRE JPMorgan Realty Income ETF	2.29%	2.62%	2.21%	3.26%	10.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JPRE and ICF in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, JPRE and ICF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, JPRE or ICF?

JPRE has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to ICF (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPRE dropped -23.84% vs ICF's -76.74%.

Which ETF is better, JPRE or ICF?

On 3-year performance, ICF leads with 10.12% vs 9.52% for JPRE. On fees, ICF is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, ICF has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JPRE or ICF?

Over the 3-year period, ICF has performed better with a 10.12% return vs 9.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JPRE or ICF?

ICF is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for JPRE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JPRE or ICF?

ICF has the higher dividend yield at 2.48%, compared with 2.29% for JPRE.

What is the main difference between JPRE and ICF?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for JPRE and 0.34% for ICF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ICF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.