PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPO vs. HOOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPO vs. HOOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF (JPO) and YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF (HOOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPO achieves a 6.43% return, which is significantly higher than HOOY's -3.91% return.


JPO

1D
-1.00%
1M
3.82%
6M
10.53%
YTD
6.43%
1Y
17.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HOOY

1D
-6.94%
1M
6.70%
6M
-3.10%
YTD
-3.91%
1Y
-3.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPO vs. HOOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JPO and HOOY is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2025

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPO vs. HOOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPO
JPO Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
JPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPO Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
JPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPO Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

HOOY
HOOY Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
HOOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOY Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOY Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPO vs. HOOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF (JPO) and YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF (HOOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JPOHOOYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.04

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

-0.07

+1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.07

-0.12

+3.18

JPO vs. HOOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPO Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is higher than the HOOY Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPO and HOOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JPO vs. HOOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPO drawdown since its inception was -24.80%, smaller than the maximum HOOY drawdown of -51.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPO and HOOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPOHOOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.80%

-51.54%

+26.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.24%

-51.54%

+37.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-28.40%

+27.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.48%

-21.11%

+16.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.74%

30.12%

-24.38%

Volatility

JPO vs. HOOY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF (JPO) is 6.36%, while YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF (HOOY) has a volatility of 16.16%. This indicates that JPO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPOHOOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.36%

16.16%

-9.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.51%

43.54%

-29.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.14%

56.45%

-37.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.08%

54.51%

-35.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.08%

54.51%

-35.43%

JPO vs. HOOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPO has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than HOOY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

JPO vs. HOOY - Dividend Comparison

JPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.28%, less than HOOY's 142.29% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
HOOY
YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF
142.29%82.87%0.00%0.00%
JPO
YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF
34.28%34.13%25.15%4.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPO and HOOY have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HOOY has higher volatility (16.16%) compared to JPO (6.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPO dropped -24.80% vs HOOY's -51.54%.

On 1-year performance, JPO leads with 17.56% vs -3.54% for HOOY. On fees, HOOY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, JPO has been the lower-risk option at 6.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JPO has performed better with a 17.56% return vs -3.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HOOY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.19% for JPO.

HOOY has the higher dividend yield at 142.29%, compared with 34.28% for JPO.

JPO is categorized as Options Trading, while HOOY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Tidal and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.19% for JPO and 0.99% for HOOY.

JPO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPO and HOOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer