PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPNL.L vs. HDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPNL.L vs. HDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR (JPNL.L) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JPNL.L is traded in GBp, while HDV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HDV values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with JPNL.L having a 14.78% return and HDV slightly higher at 14.87%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JPNL.L having a 9.84% annualized return and HDV not far ahead at 10.21%.


JPNL.L

1D
-0.07%
1M
3.10%
YTD
14.78%
6M
14.31%
1Y
31.62%
3Y*
14.93%
5Y*
9.61%
10Y*
9.84%

HDV

1D
0.85%
1M
3.29%
YTD
14.87%
6M
14.21%
1Y
24.80%
3Y*
12.66%
5Y*
11.85%
10Y*
10.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPNL.L vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPNL.L
Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR
14.78%17.96%7.74%12.66%-5.98%1.37%8.23%15.36%-9.97%14.63%
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
14.87%3.92%16.15%-3.37%19.78%20.58%-9.23%15.65%2.74%3.59%

Correlation

The correlation between JPNL.L and HDV is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2012

0.32

Over the past year, the correlation between JPNL.L and HDV has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.32, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

JPNL.L vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JPNL.L
HDV

Industrials

26.9%
1.4%

Technology

17.7%
8.2%

Financial Services

17.1%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.1%
6.1%

Communication Services

7.8%
0.1%

Healthcare

5.5%
16.5%

Basic Materials

4.7%
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
24.1%

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Utilities

1.3%
9.2%

Energy

0.9%
22.3%

Industrials

JPNL.L
26.9%
HDV
1.4%

Technology

JPNL.L
17.7%
HDV
8.2%

Financial Services

JPNL.L
17.1%
HDV
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

JPNL.L
12.1%
HDV
6.1%

Communication Services

JPNL.L
7.8%
HDV
0.1%

Healthcare

JPNL.L
5.5%
HDV
16.5%

Basic Materials

JPNL.L
4.7%
HDV
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

JPNL.L
4.2%
HDV
24.1%

Real Estate

JPNL.L
1.8%
HDV

-

Utilities

JPNL.L
1.3%
HDV
9.2%

Energy

JPNL.L
0.9%
HDV
22.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPNL.L vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPNL.L
JPNL.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
JPNL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPNL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPNL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
JPNL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPNL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

HDV
HDV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
HDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDV Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
HDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDV Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPNL.L vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR (JPNL.L) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPNL.LHDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.40

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

4.54

-1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.96

12.31

-2.35

JPNL.L vs. HDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPNL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the HDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPNL.L and HDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPNL.LHDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

2.33

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.93

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.62

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.78

-0.06

Drawdowns

JPNL.L vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPNL.L drawdown since its inception was -25.42%, smaller than the maximum HDV drawdown of -30.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPNL.L and HDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPNL.LHDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.42%

-30.42%

+5.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.63%

-5.49%

-5.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.44%

-12.65%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.53%

-13.32%

-5.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.42%

-30.42%

+5.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-0.96%

+0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.36%

-4.30%

-1.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

2.02%

+1.35%

Volatility

JPNL.L vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR (JPNL.L) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) have volatilities of 3.61% and 3.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPNL.LHDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.61%

3.76%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.26%

8.61%

+5.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.96%

10.70%

+7.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.30%

12.76%

+5.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.84%

16.49%

+1.35%

JPNL.L vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPNL.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

JPNL.L vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison

JPNL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than HDV's 2.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
2.88%3.22%3.67%3.82%3.56%3.47%4.07%3.27%3.67%3.27%3.28%3.92%
JPNL.L
Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR
0.62%0.71%0.74%1.23%1.83%1.37%1.14%1.98%1.84%1.43%1.96%1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPNL.L and HDV have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for JPNL.L.

JPNL.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while HDV is Dividend. JPNL.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for JPNL.L and 0.08% for HDV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPNL.L and HDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer