JPME vs. RUNN

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

JPME (JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF) and RUNN (Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. JPME is passively managed, while RUNN is actively managed. Over the past year, JPME returned 23.45% vs -0.24% for RUNN. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JPME charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for RUNN.

Performance

JPME vs. RUNN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME) and Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPME achieves a 13.26% return, which is significantly higher than RUNN's -2.12% return.

JPME

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: 1.41%
• YTD: 13.26%
• 6M: 13.96%
• 1Y: 23.45%
• 3Y*: 15.36%
• 5Y*: 8.68%
• 10Y*: 11.00%

RUNN

• 1D: -1.22%
• 1M: -1.04%
• YTD: -2.12%
• 6M: -1.36%
• 1Y: -0.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPME vs. RUNN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JPME JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF	13.26%	8.26%	13.55%	8.69%
RUNN Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF	-2.12%	2.30%	17.16%	12.05%

Correlation

The correlation between JPME and RUNN is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2023	0.86

The correlation between JPME and RUNN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

JPME vs. RUNN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JPME	RUNN
Technology	12.0%	17.8%
Real Estate	11.5%	-
Industrials	11.5%	39.4%
Healthcare	10.7%	13.3%
Consumer Defensive	9.6%	-
Utilities	9.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.8%	8.3%
Financial Services	8.1%	12.8%
Energy	7.8%	-
Basic Materials	7.0%	2.0%
Communication Services	3.6%	2.1%

Return for Risk

JPME vs. RUNN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPME

JPME Risk / Return Rank: 61
JPME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
JPME Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
JPME Omega Ratio Rank: 54
JPME Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
JPME Martin Ratio Rank: 68

RUNN

RUNN Risk / Return Rank: 8
RUNN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
RUNN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
RUNN Omega Ratio Rank: 8
RUNN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
RUNN Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPME vs. RUNN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME) and Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JPME	RUNN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.95	-0.02	+1.97
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.83	0.07	+2.77
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.01	+0.33
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.40	-0.09	+3.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.67	-0.22	+12.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JPME vs. RUNN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPME Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the RUNN Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPME and RUNN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JPME	RUNN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.95	-0.02	+1.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.70	-0.06

Drawdowns

JPME vs. RUNN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPME drawdown since its inception was -41.01%, which is greater than RUNN's maximum drawdown of -16.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPME and RUNN.

Drawdown Indicators

	JPME	RUNN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.01%	-16.83%	-24.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.84%	-10.34%	+3.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.70%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.01%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-7.06%	+7.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.39%	-3.53%	-0.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.84%	4.31%	-2.47%

Volatility

JPME vs. RUNN - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME) and Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN) have volatilities of 3.49% and 3.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JPME	RUNN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.49%	3.53%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.52%	9.69%	-1.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.06%	12.84%	-0.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.15%	13.80%	+2.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.70%	13.80%	+3.90%

JPME vs. RUNN - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPME has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than RUNN's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

JPME vs. RUNN - Dividend Comparison

JPME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, more than RUNN's 0.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
JPME JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF	1.82%	2.03%	1.77%	1.84%	1.84%	1.44%	1.51%	1.68%	1.80%	1.17%	0.91%
RUNN Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF	0.57%	0.55%	0.39%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JPME and RUNN in my portfolio?

JPME and RUNN have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JPME or RUNN?

RUNN has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to JPME (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPME dropped -41.01% vs RUNN's -16.83%.

Which ETF is better, JPME or RUNN?

On 1-year performance, JPME leads with 23.45% vs -0.24% for RUNN. On fees, JPME is cheaper at 0.24% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JPME or RUNN?

Over the 1-year period, JPME has performed better with a 23.45% return vs -0.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JPME or RUNN?

JPME is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for RUNN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JPME or RUNN?

JPME has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 0.57% for RUNN.

What is the main difference between JPME and RUNN?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Running Oak Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for JPME and 0.58% for RUNN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JPME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.